ArticleCellular reprogramming2015
Derivation of Rabbit Embryonic Stem Cells from Vitrified-Thawed Embryos.
Article in Cellular reprogramming, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A universal 6iL/E4 culture system for deriving and maintaining embryonic stem cells across mammalian species.Cell research · 2026Article
- Novel feeder-cell-free 3C system promotes the transition from primed to formative pluripotency, self-renewal, and germline differentiation in rabbit embryonic stem cellsFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Generation of Rabbit Chimeras by Eight-Cell Stage Embryo Injection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Genome engineering technologies in rabbits.Journal of biomedical research · 2020Article
- Dynamic patterns of H3K4me3, H3K27me3, and Nanog during rabbit embryo development.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
- Deriving rabbit embryonic stem cells by small molecule inhibitors.American journal of translational research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rabbit is a useful animal model for regenerative medicine. We previously developed pluripotent rabbit embryonic stem cell (rbESC) lines using fresh embryos. We also successfully cryopreserved rabbit embryos by vitrification. In the present work, we combined these two technologies to derive rbESCs using vitrified-thawed (V/T) embryos. We demonstrate that V/T blastocysts (BLs) can be used to derive pluripotent rbESCs with efficiencies comparable to those using fresh BLs. These ESCs are undistinguishable from the ones derived from fresh embryos. We tested the developmental capacity of rbESCs derived from V/T embryos by BL injection experiments and produced chimeric kits. Our work adds cryopreservation to the toolbox of rabbit stem cell research and applications and will greatly expand the available research materials for regenerative medicine in a clinically relevant animal model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.