SynthesisMedicine2015
Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in the Detection of Lesion-Specific Ischemia: An Integrated Analysis of 3 Pivotal Trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Additional diagnostic value of new CT imaging techniques for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in ischemia-causing coronary stenosis: a meta-analysis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for identification of ischemic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Fractional flow reserve calculation optimized by myocardial computed tomography perfusion information.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Novel Non-invasive Fractional Flow Reserve from Coronary CT Angiography to Determine Ischemic Coronary Stenosis.US cardiology · 2021Review
- State of the Art in Noninvasive Imaging of Ischemic Heart Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Women: Indications, Performance, and Limitations.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2020Review
- Imaging to Assess Ischemic Heart Disease in Women.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard for the determination of physiologic stenosis severity and the need for revascularization. FFR computed from standard acquired coronary computed tomographic angiography datasets (FFRCT) is an emerging technology which allows calculation of FFR using resting image data from coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). However, the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT in the evaluation of lesion-specific myocardial ischemia remains to be confirmed, especially in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. We performed an integrated analysis of data from 3 prospective, international, and multicenter trials, which assessed the diagnostic performance of FFRCT using invasive FFR as a reference standard. Three studies evaluating 609 patients and 1050 vessels were included. The total calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of FFRCT were 82.8%, 77.7%, 60.8%, 91.6%, and 79.2%, respectively, for the per-vessel analysis, and 89.4%, 70.5%, 69.7%, 89.7%, and 78.7%, respectively, for the per-patient analysis. Compared with CCTA alone, FFRCT demonstrated significantly improved accuracy (P < 0.001) in detecting lesion-specific ischemia. In patients with intermediate coronary stenosis, FFRCT remained both highly sensitive and specific with respect to the diagnosis of ischemia. In conclusion, FFRCT appears to be a reliable noninvasive alternative to invasive FFR, as it demonstrates high accuracy in the determination of anatomy and lesion-specific ischemia, which justifies the performance of additional randomized controlled trials to evaluate both the clinical benefits and the cost-effectiveness of FFRCT-guided coronary revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.