Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26579777›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2015

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of 441 Two-Residue Peptides in Aqueous Solution: Conformational Preferences and Neighboring Residue Effects with the Amber ff99SB-ildn-NMR Force Field.

Shuxiang Li, Casey T Andrews, Tamara Frembgen-Kesner, Mark S Miller, Stephen L Siemonsma, Timothy D Collingsworth, Isaac T Rockafellow, Nguyet Anh Ngo, Brady A Campbell, Reid F Brown and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. RNA force field with accuracy comparable to state-of-the-art protein force fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Shuxiang LiDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Casey T AndrewsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Tamara Frembgen-KesnerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Mark S MillerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Stephen L SiemonsmaDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Timothy D CollingsworthDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Isaac T RockafellowDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Nguyet Anh NgoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Brady A CampbellDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Reid F BrownDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Chengxuan GuoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Michael SchrodtDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Yu-Tsan LiuDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Adrian H ElcockDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.

Funding

Molecular Simulations of Folding & Association in Physiological EnvironmentsR01GM087290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ELCOCK, ADRIAN HAMILTON · 2009 to 2017
$1.6M
Molecular Simulations of Cotranslational FoldingR01GM099865 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ELCOCK, ADRIAN HAMILTON · 2012 to 2015
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087290NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the intrinsic conformational preferences of amino acids and the extent to which they are modulated by neighboring residues is a key issue for developing predictive models of protein folding and stability. Here we present the results of 441 independent explicit-solvent MD simulations of all possible two-residue peptides that contain the 20 standard amino acids with histidine modeled in both its neutral and protonated states. (3)J(HNHα) coupling constants and δ(Hα) chemical shifts calculated from the MD simulations correlate quite well with recently published experimental measurements for a corresponding set of two-residue peptides. Neighboring residue effects (NREs) on the average (3)J(HNHα) and δ(Hα) values of adjacent residues are also reasonably well reproduced, with the large NREs exerted experimentally by aromatic residues, in particular, being accurately captured. NREs on the secondary structure preferences of adjacent amino acids have been computed and compared with corresponding effects observed in a coil library and the average β-turn preferences of all amino acid types have been determined. Finally, the intrinsic conformational preferences of histidine, and its NREs on the conformational preferences of adjacent residues, are both shown to be strongly affected by the protonation state of the imidazole ring.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularAmino AcidsPeptidesProtein ConformationSolutionsWaterAmino AcidsPeptidesSolutionsWater

Identifiers

PMID26579777
PMCPMC4656151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.