Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26579699›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation2016

Bimanual dexterity assessment: validation of a revised form of the turning subtest from the Minnesota Dexterity Test.

Luigi Tesio, Anna Simone, Giuliano Zebellin, Viviana Rota, Calogero Malfitano, Laura Perucca

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03726385 (Investigation of the Effectiveness of Visual Feedback Training on Upper Extremity Functions), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03726385 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of the Effectiveness of Visual Feedback Training on Upper Extremity Functions

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDilara Merve SarıRan2018 to 2018Enrolled38ConditionsCerebral Palsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of training and selected factors on speed and quality of performing different tasks on the endoscopic simulator.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Luigi TesioaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences for Health bDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan cPhD Program in Advanced Sciences And Technologies in Rehabilitation Medicine and Sports, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome dSchool of Specialization, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Universitá degli Studi, Milan, Italy.
Anna Simone
Giuliano Zebellin
Viviana Rota
Calogero Malfitano
Laura Perucca

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bimanual coordination underlies many daily activities. It is tested by various versions of the old Minnesota Dexterity Test (dating back to 1931, 'turning' subtest). This, however, is ill standardized, may be time-consuming, and has poor normative data. A timed-revised form of the turning subtest (MTTrf) is presented. Age-related norms and test-retest reliability were computed. Sixty-four healthy individuals, 24-79 years, comprising 34 women, were required to pick up 60 small plastic disks from wells, rotate each disk, and transfer it to the other hand, which must replace it, as quickly as possible. Two trials were requested for each hand (ABBA sequence). The average time (seconds) across the 4 trials gave the test score. Participants were grouped (CART algorithm) into 3 statistically distinct (P<0.05) age×score strata, with cutoff 53+ and 73+ years, and tested at baseline and after 1 week. Test-retest reliability was measured both as consistency [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICCs) model 2.1] and as agreement (Bland-Altman plot). From the ICCs, the individual test-retest minimal real difference (in seconds) was computed. The whole MTTrf took less than 4 min to administer. Baseline scores ranged from 40 to 78 s. The ICCs ranged from 0.45 to 0.81 and the minimal real difference ranged from 6.68 to 13.40 s across the age groups. Fifty-nine out of 64 observations (92%) fell within the confidence limits of the Bland-Altman plot. The MTTrf is a reliable and practical test of bimanual coordination. It may be a useful addition to protocols of manual testing in occupational therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHandHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor SkillsOccupational TherapyReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26579699
PMCPMC4900427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.