Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26579629›Full record

Trial reportJournal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology2015

Refining Clinical Judgment of Treatment Response and Symptom Remission Identification in Childhood Anxiety Using a Signal Detection Analysis on the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale.

Carly J Johnco, Alison Salloum, Adam B Lewin, Eric A Storch

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How well can commonly used anxiety scales detect treatment outcomes in the context of autism?Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2025
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carly J Johnco1 Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida , St. Petersburg, Florida.
Alison Salloum2 School of Social Work, University of South Florida , St. Petersburg, Florida.
Adam B Lewin1 Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida , St. Petersburg, Florida.
Eric A Storch1 Department of Pediatrics, University of South Florida , St. Petersburg, Florida.
University of South Florida St. Petersburg · USTampa Bay Research Institute · US

Funding

Utilizing Health Information Technology to improve Health Care Quality: ImplementR18HS018665 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI STORCH, ERIC A. · 2011 to 2013
$1.1M
AHRQ HHS 1R18HS018665-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine guidelines for delineating treatment response and symptom remission for children with anxiety disorder based on the five item and Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS5), and replicate guidelines using the six item PARS (PARS6).

methodsParticipants were 73 children 7-13 years of age with a primary anxiety disorder who received computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety. Signal detection analyses utilizing receiver operating curve procedures were used to determine optimal guidelines for defining treatment response and symptom remission for youth with anxiety disorders on the PARS5 and PARS6. The percent reduction in anxiety severity was used to predict treatment responder status. The percent reduction in symptoms and posttreatment raw score were used to predict remission status.

resultsOptimal prediction of treatment response based on gold standard criteria was achieved at 15-20% reduction in symptoms on the PARS5 (with 20% reduction achieving marginally higher accuracy), and 20% reduction on the PARS6. A 25% reduction in symptoms on the PARS5 or a posttreatment raw score cutoff of 9 optimally predicted remission status. For the PARS6, a cutoff of 35% reduction or a posttreatment score of 11, was considered optimal for determining remission in clinical settings, whereas a 30% reduction or score of 12 was considered optimal for research settings.

conclusionsWith different scoring options available for the PARS, these results provide guidelines for determining response and remission based on the PARS5 and PARS6 scores. Guidelines have implications for use in clinical trials, as well as for assessment of change in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Predictive Value of TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSignal Detection, PsychologicalAdolescentAnxiety DisordersChildCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMalePractice Guidelines as TopicRemission InductionROC CurveTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26579629
PMCPMC4653818
OpenAlexW2216413399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.