Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26579518›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2015

Planning the Surgical Correction of Spinal Deformities: Toward the Identification of the Biomechanical Principles by Means of Numerical Simulation.

Fabio Galbusera, Tito Bassani, Luigi La Barbera, Claudia Ottardi, Benedikt Schlager, Marco Brayda-Bruno, Tomaso Villa, Hans-Joachim Wilke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bone density optimized pedicle screw insertion.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  4. The sitting vs standing spine.North American Spine Society journal · 2022
    Review
  5. Computational modelling of the scoliotic spine: A literature review.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Determinants of the biomechanical and radiological outcome of surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: the role of rod properties and patient characteristics.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fabio GalbuseraIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi , Milan , Italy.
Tito BassaniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi , Milan , Italy.
Luigi La BarberaLaBS, Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano , Milan , Italy.
Claudia OttardiLaBS, Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano , Milan , Italy.
Benedikt SchlagerCenter of Musculoskeletal Research Ulm, Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University , Ulm , Germany.
Marco Brayda-BrunoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi , Milan , Italy.
Tomaso VillaLaBS, Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano , Milan , Italy.
Hans-Joachim WilkeCenter of Musculoskeletal Research Ulm, Institute of Orthopedic Research and Biomechanics, Ulm University , Ulm , Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In decades of technical developments after the first surgical corrections of spinal deformities, the set of devices, techniques, and tools available to the surgeons has widened dramatically. Nevertheless, the rate of complications due to mechanical failure of the fixation or the instrumentation remains rather high. Indeed, basic and clinical research about the principles of deformity correction and the optimal surgical strategies (i.e., the choice of the fusion length, the most appropriate instrumentation, and the degree of tolerable correction) did not progress as much as the implantable devices and the surgical techniques. In this work, a software approach for the biomechanical simulation of the correction of patient-specific spinal deformities aimed to the identification of its biomechanical principles is presented. The method is based on three-dimensional reconstructions of the spinal anatomy obtained from biplanar radiographic images. A user-friendly graphical user interface allows for the planning of the desired deformity correction and to simulate the implantation of pedicle screws. Robust meshing of the instrumented spine is provided by using consolidated computational geometry and meshing libraries. Based on a finite element simulation, the program is able to predict the loads and stresses acting in the instrumentation as well as those in the biological tissues. A simple test case (reduction of a low-grade spondylolisthesis at L3-L4) was simulated as a proof of concept, and showed plausible results. Despite the numerous limitations of this approach which will be addressed in future implementations, the preliminary outcome is promising and encourages a wide effort toward its refinement.

Indexed as

deformity correctionfinite elementpatient specificscoliosisspinal deformityspine biomechanics

Identifiers

PMID26579518
PMCPMC4630605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.