Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26579212›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2015

Remodeling of nuclear landscapes during human myelopoietic cell differentiation maintains co-aligned active and inactive nuclear compartments.

Barbara Hübner, Mariana Lomiento, Fabiana Mammoli, Doris Illner, Yolanda Markaki, Sergio Ferrari, Marion Cremer, Thomas Cremer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Super-resolution structured illumination microscopy: past, present and future.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara HübnerDepartment Biology II, Biocenter, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Grosshadernerstr. 2, 82152 Martinsried, Germany ; School of Biological Sciences (SBS), Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore, Singapore.
Mariana LomientoDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena (Unimore), Modena, Italy.
Fabiana MammoliDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena (Unimore), Modena, Italy.
Doris IllnerDepartment Biology II, Biocenter, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Grosshadernerstr. 2, 82152 Martinsried, Germany ; Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany.
Yolanda MarkakiDepartment Biology II, Biocenter, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Grosshadernerstr. 2, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Sergio FerrariDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Modena (Unimore), Modena, Italy.
Marion CremerDepartment Biology II, Biocenter, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Grosshadernerstr. 2, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Thomas CremerDepartment Biology II, Biocenter, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), Grosshadernerstr. 2, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies of higher order chromatin organization in nuclei of mammalian species revealed both structural consistency and species-specific differences between cell lines and during early embryonic development. Here, we extended our studies to nuclear landscapes in the human myelopoietic lineage representing a somatic cell differentiation system. Our longterm goal is a search for structural features of nuclei, which are restricted to certain cell types/species, as compared to features, which are evolutionary highly conserved, arguing for their basic functional roles in nuclear organization.

resultsCommon human hematopoietic progenitors, myeloid precursor cells, differentiated monocytes and granulocytes analyzed by super-resolution fluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy revealed profound differences with respect to global chromatin arrangements, the nuclear space occupied by the interchromatin compartment and the distribution of nuclear pores. In contrast, we noted a consistent organization in all cell types with regard to two co-aligned networks, an active (ANC) and an inactive (INC) nuclear compartment delineated by functionally relevant hallmarks. The ANC is enriched in active RNA polymerase II, splicing speckles and histone signatures for transcriptionally competent chromatin (H3K4me3), whereas the INC carries marks for repressed chromatin (H3K9me3).

conclusionsOur findings substantiate the conservation of the recently published ANC-INC network model of mammalian nuclear organization during human myelopoiesis irrespective of profound changes of the global nuclear architecture observed during this differentiation process. According to this model, two spatially co-aligned and functionally interacting active and inactive nuclear compartments (ANC and INC) pervade the nuclear space.

Indexed as

Active nuclear compartmentChromatin density classificationChromatin domainElectron microscopyInterchromatin compartmentMyelopoiesisNuclear architecturePerichromatin regionSomatic cell differentiationSuper-resolution microscopy

Identifiers

PMID26579212
PMCPMC4647504
OpenAlexW2213996336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.