ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2015
An insight into the isolation, enumeration, and molecular detection of Listeria monocytogenes in food.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Occurrence, Species Distribution, and Antimicrobial Resistance ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Genome-Informed Identification of Species-Specific Diagnostic Markers for Listeria Using Pangenome Analysis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and application of ActA-based competitive ELISA for the specific diagnosis of ovine listeriosis.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Exploring the dynamic relationship between antimicrobial resistance, virulence fitness, and host responses in Listeria monocytogenes infections.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Characterization ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fluorescent Antibiotics: Bridging Diagnostic and Therapy in the Fight against Bacterial Infections.Small science · 2025Review
- Exploration of the biodiversity and mining novel target genes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparison of real-time PCR and nested PCR based on the HlyA gene for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes. Application on cheese samples.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Clinical Findings ofMicroorganisms · 2024Review
- Listeria monocytogenes an Emerging Pathogen: a Comprehensive Overview on Listeriosis, Virulence Determinants, Detection, and Anti-Listerial Interventions.Microbial ecology · 2023Review
- Use of a taxon-specific reference database for accurate metagenomics-based pathogen detection of Listeria monocytogenes in turkey deli meat and spinach.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Identification by High-Throughput Real-Time PCR of 30 Major Circulating Listeria monocytogenes Clonal Complexes in Europe.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- A Review of Modern Methods for the Detection of Foodborne Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Characterisation and antibiotic resistance of Yersinia enterocolitica from various meat categories, South Africa.The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research · 2022Article
- Pathological study and molecular detection of zoonotic diseases in small ruminants at slaughterhouses in Mymensingh, Bangladesh.Veterinary world · 2022Article
- Review
- Novel Approaches to Environmental Monitoring and Control ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- An Exploration ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Bacteriophage Tail Proteins as a Tool for Bacterial Pathogen Recognition-A Literature Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Listeria monocytogenes, a foodborne pathogen that can cause listeriosis through the consumption of food contaminated with this pathogen. The ability of L. monocytogenes to survive in extreme conditions and cause food contaminations have become a major concern. Hence, routine microbiological food testing is necessary to prevent food contamination and outbreaks of foodborne illness. This review provides insight into the methods for cultural detection, enumeration, and molecular identification of L. monocytogenes in various food samples. There are a number of enrichment and plating media that can be used for the isolation of L. monocytogenes from food samples. Enrichment media such as buffered Listeria enrichment broth, Fraser broth, and University of Vermont Medium (UVM) Listeria enrichment broth are recommended by regulatory agencies such as Food and Drug Administration-bacteriological and analytical method (FDA-BAM), US Department of Agriculture-Food and Safety (USDA-FSIS), and International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Many plating media are available for the isolation of L. monocytogenes, for instance, polymyxin acriflavin lithium-chloride ceftazidime aesculin mannitol, Oxford, and other chromogenic media. Besides, reference methods like FDA-BAM, ISO 11290 method, and USDA-FSIS method are usually applied for the cultural detection or enumeration of L. monocytogenes. most probable number technique is applied for the enumeration of L. monocytogenes in the case of low level contamination. Molecular methods including polymerase chain reaction, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, real-time/quantitative polymerase chain reaction, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, DNA microarray, and next generation sequencing technology for the detection and identification of L. monocytogenes are discussed in this review. Overall, molecular methods are rapid, sensitive, specific, time- and labor-saving. In future, there are chances for the development of new techniques for the detection and identification of foodborne with improved features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.