Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26579044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

Complementary fMRI and EEG evidence for more efficient neural processing of rhythmic vs. unpredictably timed sounds.

Nienke van Atteveldt, Gabriella Musacchia, Elana Zion-Golumbic, Pejman Sehatpour, Daniel C Javitt, Charles Schroeder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nienke van AtteveldtDepartment of Educational Neuroscience, VU University , Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Institute Learn!, VU University , Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University , Maastricht, Netherlands.
Gabriella MusacchiaDepartment of Audiology and Speech and Language Pathology, University of the Pacific , San Francisco, CA, USA ; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University Medical School , Stanford, CA, USA.
Elana Zion-GolumbicThe Gonda Center for Multidisciplinary Brain Research, Bar Ilan University , Ramat Gan, Israel.
Pejman SehatpourCognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia Program, Nathan S. Kline Institute , Orangeburg, NY, USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA ; New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA.
Daniel C JavittCognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia Program, Nathan S. Kline Institute , Orangeburg, NY, USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA ; New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA.
Charles SchroederCognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia Program, Nathan S. Kline Institute , Orangeburg, NY, USA ; Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA ; New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University , New York, NY, USA.

Funding

The Conte Center for Schizophrenia ResearchP50MH086385 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI JAVITT, DANIEL C. · 2009 to 2013
$10.7M
EARLY CORTICAL PROCESSING IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH049334 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI JAVITT, DANIEL C. · 1998 to 2022
$8.8M
PHYSIOLOGY OF VISUAL DYSFUNCTION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAR01MH060358 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI SCHROEDER, CHARLES E · 2000 to 2013
$4.0M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH086385NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH049334NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain's fascinating ability to adapt its internal neural dynamics to the temporal structure of the sensory environment is becoming increasingly clear. It is thought to be metabolically beneficial to align ongoing oscillatory activity to the relevant inputs in a predictable stream, so that they will enter at optimal processing phases of the spontaneously occurring rhythmic excitability fluctuations. However, some contexts have a more predictable temporal structure than others. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the processing of rhythmic sounds is more efficient than the processing of irregularly timed sounds. To do this, we simultaneously measured functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electro-encephalograms (EEG) while participants detected oddball target sounds in alternating blocks of rhythmic (e.g., with equal inter-stimulus intervals) or random (e.g., with randomly varied inter-stimulus intervals) tone sequences. Behaviorally, participants detected target sounds faster and more accurately when embedded in rhythmic streams. The fMRI response in the auditory cortex was stronger during random compared to random tone sequence processing. Simultaneously recorded N1 responses showed larger peak amplitudes and longer latencies for tones in the random (vs. the rhythmic) streams. These results reveal complementary evidence for more efficient neural and perceptual processing during temporally predictable sensory contexts.

Indexed as

auditory cortexEEGfMRIrhythmsound processingtemporal context

Identifiers

PMID26579044
PMCPMC4621386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.