ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2015
Detecting the subtle shape differences in hemodynamic responses at the group level.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human amygdala nuclei show distinct developmental trajectories from adolescence to adulthood in functional integration with prefrontal circuitry.Cell reports · 2025Article
- Article
- BOLD Response is more than just magnitude: Improving detection sensitivity through capturing hemodynamic profiles.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Article
- Pubertal development underlies optimization of inhibitory control through specialization of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- Distributed and Multifaceted Effects of Threat and Safety.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- Improved localization of language areas using single voxel signal analysis of unprocessed fMRI data.Frontiers in radiology · 2022Article
- Auditory Target Detection Enhances Visual Processing and Hippocampal Functional Connectivity.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Statistical power or more precise insights into neuro-temporal dynamics? Assessing the benefits of rapid temporal sampling in fMRI.Progress in neurobiology · 2021Review
- Dopamine-related striatal neurophysiology is associated with specialization of frontostriatal reward circuitry through adolescence.Progress in neurobiology · 2021Article
- Beyond linearity in neuroimaging: Capturing nonlinear relationships with application to longitudinal studies.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Executive function network's white matter alterations relate to Parkinson's disease motor phenotype.Neuroscience letters · 2021Article
- Dynamic time warping outperforms Pearson correlation in detecting atypical functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Influences of affective context on amygdala functional connectivity during cognitive control from adolescence through adulthood.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Article
- Hemodynamic responses are abnormal in isolated cervical dystonia.Journal of neuroscience research · 2020Article
- Distinct temporal brain dynamics in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia during emotion regulation.Psychological medicine · 2020Article
- Handling Multiplicity in Neuroimaging Through Bayesian Lenses with Multilevel Modeling.Neuroinformatics · 2019Article
- Proactive and reactive cognitive control rely on flexible use of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- The experience of vivid autobiographical reminiscence is supported by subjective content representations in the precuneus.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Functional connections between activated and deactivated brain regions mediate emotional interference during externally directed cognition.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nature of the hemodynamic response (HDR) is still not fully understood due to the multifaceted processes involved. Aside from the overall amplitude, the response may vary across cognitive states, tasks, brain regions, and subjects with respect to characteristics such as rise and fall speed, peak duration, undershoot shape, and overall duration. Here we demonstrate that the fixed-shape (FSM) or adjusted-shape (ASM) methods may fail to detect some shape subtleties (e.g., speed of rise or recovery, or undershoot). In contrast, the estimated-shape method (ESM) through multiple basis functions can provide the opportunity to identify some subtle shape differences and achieve higher statistical power at both individual and group levels. Previously, some dimension reduction approaches focused on the peak magnitude, or made inferences based on the area under the curve (AUC) or interaction, which can lead to potential misidentifications. By adopting a generic framework of multivariate modeling (MVM), we showcase a hybrid approach that is validated by simulations and real data. With the whole HDR shape integrity maintained as input at the group level, the approach allows the investigator to substantiate these more nuanced effects through the unique HDR shape features. Unlike the few analyses that were limited to main effect, two- or three-way interactions, we extend the modeling approach to an inclusive platform that is more adaptable than the conventional GLM. With multiple effect estimates from ESM for each condition, linear mixed-effects (LME) modeling should be used at the group level when there is only one group of subjects without any other explanatory variables. Under other situations, an approximate approach through dimension reduction within the MVM framework can be adopted to achieve a practical equipoise among representation, false positive control, statistical power, and modeling flexibility. The associated program 3dMVM is publicly available as part of the AFNI suite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.