ArticleBMC nursing2015
The Professional Nurse Self-Assessment Scale: Psychometric testing in Norwegian long term and home care contexts.
Article in BMC nursing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nursing staff competence assessment instruments: a scoping review with implications for long-term care.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Polish Adaptation of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Graduating Nursing Students' Self-Assessment of Clinical Competence and Need for Further Training: A Nordic Cross- Sectional Study.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of the Professional Fit Scale in Nursing.Nursing open · 2025Article
- Job descriptions as drivers for changes in practice patterns: a cross-sectional survey of Nurse Practitioners in Norway.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Structural Validity and Internal Consistency of the Professional Nurse Self-Assessment A-Scale (II) for Measuring Clinical Competence Among Graduating Nordic Nursing Students.Nursing research and practice · 2025Article
- Adaptation and validation of the scale for the prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections among nursing students: an exploratory factor analysis approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Self-Efficacy in Nursing Competencies during Students' Clinical Practicum: The Development of a Self-Assessment Scale.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Perceived competence and related factors affecting the development of the clinical competence of nursing students at two university sites in Namibia: a cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Core Competencies for Gerontogeriatric Nursing: A Validation Study.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Status and associated factors of gerontological nurse specialists' core competency: a national cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Developing a core competency framework for advanced practice nursing in mainland China: a sequential exploratory study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Operating theatre nurses' with managerial responsibility: Self-reported clinical competence and need of competence development in perioperative nursing.Nursing open · 2022Article
- Development of clinical competence - a longitudinal survey of nurse practitioner students.BMC nursing · 2021Article
- Newly graduated registered nurses' self-assessed clinical competence and their need for further training.Nursing open · 2020Article
- Article
- Self-assessed competence and need for further training among registered nurses in somatic hospital wards in Sweden: a cross-sectional survey.BMC nursing · 2020Article
- Competence-based performance evaluation in hospital nurses.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2019Article
- Evaluation of clinical competence and its related factors among ICU nurses in Kermanshah-Iran: A cross-sectional study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNurses' clinical competence is vital to ensure safe and high quality care, and the continuous assessment of nurses' clinical competence is of major concern. A validated instrument for the self-assessment of nurses' clinical competence at different educational levels across specialties and countries is lacking. The aim of this study was to test the reliability and construct validity of the new Professional Nurse Self-Assessment Scale (ProffNurse SAS) questionnaire in long term and home care contexts in Norway. The questionnaire is based on the Nordic Advanced Practice Nursing model, in which the nurse-patient relationship is central.
methodsThe study has a cross-sectional survey design. A purposive sample of 357 registered nurses who worked in long term and home care contexts in two geographical regions encompassing eight municipalities and three counties was included. The respondents completed the 74-item ProffNurse SAS questionnaire and demographic background data was collected. Data collection was conducted in two phases: first region autumn 2011 and second region spring 2012. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were used to test the psychometric properties of the questionnaire and included the following steps: assessment of the factorality of the data, factor extraction by Principal Component Analysis (PCA), oblimin (oblique) factor rotation, and interpretation. Cronbach's alpha was used to estimate the internal consistency.
resultsThe PCA revealed a six-component structure, reducing the number of items in the questionnaire from 74 to 51. Based on the content of the highest-loading items, the six components were named: Direct Clinical Practice, Professional Development, Ethical Decision-Making, Clinical Leadership, Cooperation and Consultation, and Critical Thinking. The Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.940 (highest; Direct Clinical Practice) to 0.737 (lowest; Critical Thinking), leading to the estimation that the ProffNurse SAS is reliable.
conclusionsThe six components support the study's theoretical framework. The ProffNurse SAS showed acceptable reliability and construct validity and may therefore be a promising instrument for the assessment of practicing nurses' clinical competence. However, we recommend further psychometric testing in other countries and contexts and the inclusion of larger samples of nurses at various levels of education, particularly master's level APNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.