Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26578792›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Chronic centrosome amplification without tumorigenesis.

Benjamin Vitre, Andrew J Holland, Anita Kulukian, Ofer Shoshani, Maretoshi Hirai, Yin Wang, Marcus Maldonado, Thomas Cho, Jihane Boubaker, Deborah A Swing and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Tools used to assay genomic instability in cancers and cancer meiomitosis.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin VitreSan Diego Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Andrew J HollandSan Diego Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Anita KulukianHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065;
Ofer ShoshaniSan Diego Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Maretoshi HiraiSkaggs School of Pharmacy, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Yin WangSan Diego Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Marcus MaldonadoSan Diego Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Thomas ChoSan Diego Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Jihane BoubakerSan Diego Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Deborah A SwingMouse Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702;
Lino TessarolloMouse Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702;
Sylvia M EvansSkaggs School of Pharmacy, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Elaine FuchsHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Laboratory of Mammalian Cell Biology and Development, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065;
Don W ClevelandSan Diego Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 dcleveland@ucsd.edu.
Ludwig Cancer Research · USCancer Genetics (United States) · USLudwig Cancer Research · BEUniversity of California, San Diego · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USRockefeller University · US

Funding

GENE EXPRESSION AND DIFFERENTIATION IN HUMAN EPIDERMISR37AR027883 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ELAINE FUCHS · 1994 to 2026
$13.3M
Transgenic Core FacilityZICBC010903 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SWING, DEBORAH · 2009 to 2019
$10.2M
MICROTUBULE REGULATIONR01GM029513 · NIGMS · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI CLEVELAND, DON W · 1985 to 2016
$8.2M
Centrosome biogenesis and copy number controlR01GM114119 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CORMACK, BRENDAN · 2015 to 2023
$3.3M
MICROTUBULE REGULATIONR37GM029513 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO · PI CLEVELAND, DON W. · 1994 to 2003
$1.8M
Approaches to Cardiac RegenerationDP1HL117649 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EVANS, SYLVIA M · 2012 to 2013
$1.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCCDPHP CDC HHS DP1HL117649NHLBI NIH HHS DP1 HL117649NIAMS NIH HHS R37 AR027883NIAMS NIH HHS R37-AR27883NIGMS NIH HHS GM114119NIGMS NIH HHS GM29513NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM029513NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114119NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM029513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Centrosomes are microtubule-organizing centers that facilitate bipolar mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. Recognizing that centrosome amplification is a common feature of aneuploid cancer cells, we tested whether supernumerary centrosomes are sufficient to drive tumor development. To do this, we constructed and analyzed mice in which centrosome amplification can be induced by a Cre-recombinase-mediated increase in expression of Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4). Elevated Plk4 in mouse fibroblasts produced supernumerary centrosomes and enhanced the expected mitotic errors, but proliferation continued only after inactivation of the p53 tumor suppressor. Increasing Plk4 levels in mice with functional p53 produced centrosome amplification in liver and skin, but this did not promote spontaneous tumor development in these tissues or enhance the growth of chemically induced skin tumors. In the absence of p53, Plk4 overexpression generated widespread centrosome amplification, but did not drive additional tumors or affect development of the fatal thymic lymphomas that arise in animals lacking p53. We conclude that, independent of p53 status, supernumerary centrosomes are not sufficient to drive tumor formation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsymmetric Cell DivisionCell Transformation, NeoplasticCentrosomeGene Expression RegulationLymphomaMiceMice, KnockoutProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSkin NeoplasmsThymus NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53Plk4 protein, mouseProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53centrosome amplificationp53Plk4 kinasetumorigenesis

Identifiers

PMID26578792
PMCPMC4655534
OpenAlexW1912910647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.