ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 178 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
178 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Algorithms on the rise: a machine learning-driven survey of prostate cancer literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in urolithiasis: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- MRI-based nomograms and radiomics in presurgical prediction of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: a systematic review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Pooled it
- CT radiomics for differentiating fat poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Radiomics in prostate cancer imaging for a personalized treatment approach - current aspects of methodology and a systematic review on validated studies.Theranostics · 2021Pooled it
- Machine learning for the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2020Pooled it
- Development and validation of MRI-based deep learning models for prediction of microsatellite instability in rectal cancer.Cancer medicine · 2021Trial
- MRI-based radiomics signature for localized prostate cancer: a new clinical tool for cancer aggressiveness prediction? Sub-study of prospective phase II trial on ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy (AIRC IG-13218).European radiology · 2021Trial
- Trial
- The Role of PET-Based Radiomic Features in Predicting Local Control of Esophageal Cancer Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- An interpretable biparametric MRI habitat radiomics model for predicting bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a dual-center study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Feasibility of automated AI-based contouring and stable radiomic feature assessment by HyperSight-CBCT Imaging for adaptive high-precision radiotherapy of prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics for detecting prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of MRI Radiomics Measurements in Men with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Active Surveillance.Cancers · 2026Article
- Prostate Cancer Classification Using Quantum Machine Learning on Multi-parametric MRI.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Multimodality and temporal analysis of cervical cancer treatment response.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Distinct visual biases affect humans and artificial intelligence in medical imaging diagnoses.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Targeting tumoral heterogeneity in lung cancer: a novel, CT-texture-guided targeted biopsy approach with exome sequencing.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for prostate cancer: Optimizing diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment.Asian journal of urology · 2025Review
- The Role of Radiomic Analysis and Different Machine Learning Models in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
118 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noninvasive, radiological image-based detection and stratification of Gleason patterns can impact clinical outcomes, treatment selection, and the determination of disease status at diagnosis without subjecting patients to surgical biopsies. We present machine learning-based automatic classification of prostate cancer aggressiveness by combining apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2-weighted (T2-w) MRI-based texture features. Our approach achieved reasonably accurate classification of Gleason scores (GS) 6(3 + 3) vs. ≥7 and 7(3 + 4) vs. 7(4 + 3) despite the presence of highly unbalanced samples by using two different sample augmentation techniques followed by feature selection-based classification. Our method distinguished between GS 6(3 + 3) and ≥7 cancers with 93% accuracy for cancers occurring in both peripheral (PZ) and transition (TZ) zones and 92% for cancers occurring in the PZ alone. Our approach distinguished the GS 7(3 + 4) from GS 7(4 + 3) with 92% accuracy for cancers occurring in both the PZ and TZ and with 93% for cancers occurring in the PZ alone. In comparison, a classifier using only the ADC mean achieved a top accuracy of 58% for distinguishing GS 6(3 + 3) vs. GS ≥7 for cancers occurring in PZ and TZ and 63% for cancers occurring in PZ alone. The same classifier achieved an accuracy of 59% for distinguishing GS 7(3 + 4) from GS 7(4 + 3) occurring in the PZ and TZ and 60% for cancers occurring in PZ alone. Separate analysis of the cancers occurring in TZ alone was not performed owing to the limited number of samples. Our results suggest that texture features derived from ADC and T2-w MRI together with sample augmentation can help to obtain reasonably accurate classification of Gleason patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.