ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015
Seasonal fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a midlatitude forest.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Microbial oxidation of atmospheric trace gases.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2022Review
- Quantifying Northern High Latitude Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) Using Carbonyl Sulfide (OCS).Global biogeochemical cycles · 2022Article
- Intercomparison of methods to estimate gross primary production based on COBiogeosciences (Online) · 2022Article
- COS-derived GPP relationships with temperature and light help explain high-latitude atmospheric COProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Partitioning net carbon dioxide fluxes into photosynthesis and respiration using neural networks.Global change biology · 2020Article
- Dry Deposition of Ozone over Land: Processes, Measurement, and Modeling.Reviews of geophysics (Washington, D.C. : 1985) · 2020Article
- Article
- Enumeration of Chemoorganotrophic Carbonyl Sulfide (COS)-degrading Microorganisms by the Most Probable Number Method.Microbes and environments · 2020Article
- Predictions of Entropy and Gibbs Energy for Carbonyl Sulfide.ACS omega · 2019Article
- Carbonyl sulfide (COS) and carbon disulfide (CSEnvironmental geochemistry and health · 2019Article
- Influences of light and humidity on carbonyl sulfide-based estimates of photosynthesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Soil exchange rates of COS and COThe ISME journal · 2019Article
- Sun-induced fluorescence and gross primary productivity during a heat wave.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Eddy covariance carbonyl sulphide flux measurements with a quantum cascade laser absorption spectrometer.Atmospheric measurement techniques · 2017Article
- Bi-directional COS exchange in bryophytes challenges its use as a tracer for gross primary productivity.The New phytologist · 2017Article
- Bryophyte gas-exchange dynamics along varying hydration status reveal a significant carbonyl sulphide (COS) sink in the dark and COS source in the light.The New phytologist · 2017Article
- Revisiting the choice of the driving temperature for eddy covariance COAgricultural and forest meteorology · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbonyl sulfide (OCS), the most abundant sulfur gas in the atmosphere, has a summer minimum associated with uptake by vegetation and soils, closely correlated with CO2. We report the first direct measurements to our knowledge of the ecosystem flux of OCS throughout an annual cycle, at a mixed temperate forest. The forest took up OCS during most of the growing season with an overall uptake of 1.36 ± 0.01 mol OCS per ha (43.5 ± 0.5 g S per ha, 95% confidence intervals) for the year. Daytime fluxes accounted for 72% of total uptake. Both soils and incompletely closed stomata in the canopy contributed to nighttime fluxes. Unexpected net OCS emission occurred during the warmest weeks in summer. Many requirements necessary to use fluxes of OCS as a simple estimate of photosynthesis were not met because OCS fluxes did not have a constant relationship with photosynthesis throughout an entire day or over the entire year. However, OCS fluxes provide a direct measure of ecosystem-scale stomatal conductance and mesophyll function, without relying on measures of soil evaporation or leaf temperature, and reveal previously unseen heterogeneity of forest canopy processes. Observations of OCS flux provide powerful, independent means to test and refine land surface and carbon cycle models at the ecosystem scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.