Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26578610›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2016

A Vision for Global Cancer Medicine: Pursuing the Equity of Chance.

Agnes Binagwaho, Claire M Wagner, Paul E Farmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Agnes BinagwahoAgnes Binagwaho, Ministry of Health of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH; Claire M. Wagner, Center for Global Cancer Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, and Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva, Switzerland; and Paul E. Farmer, Harvard Medical School, Partners In Health, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. agnes_binagwaho@hms.harvard.edu.
Claire M WagnerAgnes Binagwaho, Ministry of Health of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH; Claire M. Wagner, Center for Global Cancer Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, and Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva, Switzerland; and Paul E. Farmer, Harvard Medical School, Partners In Health, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Paul E FarmerAgnes Binagwaho, Ministry of Health of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH; Claire M. Wagner, Center for Global Cancer Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, and Union for International Cancer Control, Geneva, Switzerland; and Paul E. Farmer, Harvard Medical School, Partners In Health, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At the turn of the century, some claimed that HIV/AIDS was a disease that could not be managed in low-income settings. It was argued that "poor people would not comply with treatment," and that treatment was too expensive and too complicated to deliver. But over the past two decades, data on outcomes have thoroughly disproved this myth. Similar arguments have more recently been made about cancer treatment: chemotherapy was said to be too toxic and too costly and that it required administration expertise beyond that available in low-income settings. We argue that these claims are similarly rooted in ideology rather than evidence. Fortunately, such claims are starting to be refuted by a diverse set of global cancer partnerships around the world that are documenting progress and positive results. In this review article, we provide examples of programs that can give us reason to hope that the treatment playing field is being leveled such that birthplace does not determine survival prognosis. We believe that through strong collaborative efforts and solidarity, the equity of chance can be achieved for patients with cancer worldwide.

Indexed as

Global HealthNeoplasmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID26578610
PMCPMC4980572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.