Trial reportJapanese journal of ophthalmology2016
Comparison of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and safety of brimonidine/timolol fixed combination and 0.5% timolol in normal-tension glaucoma patients.
Trial report in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patients' Satisfaction with Topical Anti-Glaucoma Medications and Associated Factors at Gondar University Tertiary Eye Care and Training Center, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021.Clinical optometry · 2023Article
- Efficacy and safety of fixed-combination brimonidine tartrate/timolol maleate in primary open-angle glaucoma, including normal-tension glaucoma.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Topical Medication Therapy for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Prolonged central nervous system and respiratory depression in preterm neonates after exposure to brimonidine tartrate and timolol maleate ophthalmic drops.GMS ophthalmology cases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of brimonidine/timolol fixed-combination (BTFC) and 0.5% timolol ophthalmic solution in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients.
methodsThis was a multi-institution, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-group study. After a full ophthalmic and glaucoma examination, a total of 110 NTG patients--55 undergoing therapy with BTFC and 55 0.5%, with timolol--participated in this study. Among them, 1 failed to meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 10 revoked their consent to participate in the study, 3 had adverse reactions, and 1 had a drug adherence rate of less than 70%. Ultimately, a total of 95 patients--48 in the BTFC group and 47 in the 0.5% timolol group--completed the study. The study visits took place at baseline and at 4 and 12 weeks. Diurnal IOP was measured at 9 a.m., 11 a.m., and 5 p.m. during the baseline visit and the visit at 12 weeks after eye-drop instillation. At each follow-up visit, compliance was assessed. Throughout the study, all adverse events were recorded and monitored by the investigators.
resultsThe average difference in IOP change measured at 11 a.m. 12 weeks after administration between the two groups was 2.10 ± 2.59 mmHg. The BTFC group had a better IOP-lowering effect at all time points than did the 0.5% timolol group. The ratio of patients whose average IOP had decreased by >20% after 4 and 12 weeks was 50 and 56% in the BTFC group, respectively, whereas it was 29.41 and 23.53% in the 0.5% timolol group, respectively (p = 0.034, <0.001).
conclusionsBTFC has a superior IOP-lowering effect than 0.5% timolol in NTG patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.