Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26578290›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine

Hospital-acquired Anemia in Critically Ill Dogs and Cats: A Multi-Institutional Study.

A M Lynch, M Respess, A E Boll, M Bozych, M McMichael, D J Fletcher, A M De Laforcade, E A Rozanski

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Propofol infusion-like syndrome in a dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A M LynchCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA.
M RespessNorthStar VETS, Robbinsville, NJ.
A E BollCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY.
M BozychCollege of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
M McMichaelCollege of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
D J FletcherCornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY.
A M De LaforcadeCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA.
E A RozanskiCummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, North Grafton, MA.
Tufts University · USCornell University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USVesta Sciences (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospital-acquired anemia is commonly described in people but limited information currently is available regarding its prevalence in animals. HYPOTHESIS/

objectivesAssess the prevalence of hospital-acquired anemia in hospitalized critically ill dogs and cats, and examine its relationship with phlebotomy practices, transfusion administration, and survival to discharge. ANIMALS: Eight hundred and fifty-one client-owned animals (688 dogs and 163 cats).

methodsA multicenter, observational study was conducted in which packed cell volume (PCV) was recorded at the time of admission and on subsequent hospitalization days. Signalment, number of blood samples obtained, underlying disease, whether or not blood products were administered, duration of hospitalization, and survival to discharge were recorded.

resultsAdmission anemia prevalence was 32%, with overall prevalence during the hospitalization period of 56%. The last recorded PCV was significantly lower than the admission PCV for both dogs (admission PCV, 42% [range, 6-67%]; last recorded PCV, 34% [range, 4-64%], P < .0001) and cats (admission PCV, 31% [range, 6-55%]; last recorded PCV, 26% [range, 10-46%], P < .0001). Patients that developed anemia had significantly more blood samples obtained (nonanemic, 5 blood samples [range, 2-54]; anemic, 7 blood samples [range, 2-49], P < .0001). Hospitalized cats were significantly more likely to develop anemia compared to dogs (P < .0001), but anemic dogs were significantly less likely to survive to discharge (P = .0001). Surgical patients were at higher risk of developing hospital-acquired anemia compared to medical patients (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hospital-acquired anemia occurred frequently, especially in surgical patients. Additional studies focused on the direct effect of phlebotomy practices on the likelihood of anemia development in hospitalized animals are warranted.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIatrogenic DiseaseAnemiaAnimalsCat DiseasesCatsCohort StudiesDog DiseasesDogsHematocritHospitals, AnimalCanineClinical pathologyFelineHematologyIntensive careTransfusion medicine

Identifiers

PMID26578290
PMCPMC4913629
OpenAlexW2176781858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.