Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26578164›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Not seeing or feeling is still believing: conscious and non-conscious pain modulation after direct and observational learning.

Natalia Egorova, Joel Park, Scott P Orr, Irving Kirsch, Randy L Gollub, Jian Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Mesocorticolimbic Pathways Encode Cue-Based Expectancy Effects on Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalia EgorovaDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Joel ParkDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Scott P OrrDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Irving KirschProgram in Placebo Studies and Therapeutic Encounter, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Randy L GollubDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Jian KongDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.

Funding

The Role of Context Effect in Acupuncture Treatment of Low Back/J.KongP01AT006663 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HIRSCHTICK, RANDY L, ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2011 to 2017
$10.0M
An fMRI study of expectancy on acupuncture treatment outcomes in knee OAR01AT005280 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HIRSCHTICK, RANDY L, KAPTCHUK, TED · 2010 to 2014
$3.9M
Neuromodulation of placebo and nocebo effectsR01AT008563 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KONG, JIAN · 2015 to 2019
$3.9M
The Neurobiology of Placebo and Nocebo Effects: A Brain Imaging StudyR01AT006364 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KONG, JIAN · 2011 to 2015
$3.6M
Neural dynamics of directly and indirectly conditioned placebo/nocebo effectR21AT008707 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KONG, JIAN · 2016 to 2017
$479k
NCCIH NIH HHS P01 AT006663NCCIH NIH HHS P01AT006663NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT0005280NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT005280NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT006364NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT006364NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT008563NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT008563NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT008707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our experience with the world is shaped not only directly through personal exposure but also indirectly through observing others and learning from their experiences. Using a conditioning paradigm, we investigated how directly and observationally learned information can affect pain perception, both consciously and non-consciously. Differences between direct and observed cues were manifest in higher pain ratings and larger skin conductance responses to directly experienced cues. However, the pain modulation effects produced by conditioning were of comparable magnitude for direct and observational learning. These results suggest that social observation can induce positive and negative pain modulation. Importantly, the fact that cues learned by observation and activated non-consciously still produced a robust conditioning effect that withstood extinction highlights the role of indirect exposure in placebo and nocebo effects.

Indexed as

ConsciousnessEmotionsLearningPainPain PerceptionUnconscious, PsychologyAdultConditioning, PsychologicalFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMalePain MeasurementPhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26578164
PMCPMC4649469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.