ReviewActa biomaterialia2016
Engineering serendipity: High-throughput discovery of materials that resist bacterial attachment.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Biocompatibility: From Classical Techniques to State-of-the-Art Functional Proteomics.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Combinatorial discovery of microtopographical landscapes that resist biofilm formation through quorum sensing mediated autolubrication.Nature communications · 2025Article
- AI energized hydrogel design, optimization and application in biomedicine.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- A potential alternative to fungicides using actives-free (meth)acrylate polymers for protection of wheat crops from fungal attachment and infection.Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC · 2023Article
- Comparative Evaluation ofVision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Droplet Microfluidic Optimisation Using Micropipette Characterisation of Bio-Instructive Polymeric Surfactants.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- High-Throughput Methods in the Discovery and Study of Biomaterials and Materiobiology.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- Natural Architectures for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2020Review
- Strontium-releasing mesoporous bioactive glasses with anti-adhesive zwitterionic surface as advanced biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration.Journal of colloid and interface science · 2020Article
- Controlling Experimental Parameters to Improve Characterization of Biomaterial Fouling.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
- Prediction of Broad-Spectrum Pathogen Attachment to Coating Materials for Biomedical Devices.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2018Article
- Engineering microbial physiology with synthetic polymers: cationic polymers induce biofilm formation inChemical science · 2017Article
- Making Silicone Rubber Highly Resistant to Bacterial Attachment Using Thiol-ene Grafting.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Controlling the colonisation of materials by microorganisms is important in a wide range of industries and clinical settings. To date, the underlying mechanisms that govern the interactions of bacteria with material surfaces remain poorly understood, limiting the ab initio design and engineering of biomaterials to control bacterial attachment. Combinatorial approaches involving high-throughput screening have emerged as key tools for identifying materials to control bacterial attachment. The hundreds of different materials assessed using these methods can be carried out with the aid of computational modelling. This approach can develop an understanding of the rules used to predict bacterial attachment to surfaces of non-toxic synthetic materials. Here we outline our view on the state of this field and the challenges and opportunities in this area for the coming years. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This opinion article on high throughput screening methods reflects one aspect of how the field of biomaterials research has developed and progressed. The piece takes the reader through key developments in biomaterials discovery, particularly focusing on need to reduce bacterial colonisation of surfaces. Such bacterial resistant surfaces are increasingly required in this age of antibiotic resistance. The influence and origin of high-throughput methods are discussed with insights into the future of biomaterials development where computational methods may drive materials development into new fertile areas of discovery. New biomaterials will exhibit responsiveness to adapt to the biological environment and promote better integration and reduced rejection or infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.