Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26577770›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Assessing the risk factors of cholera epidemic in the Buea Health District of Cameroon.

Dickson Shey Nsagha, Julius Atashili, Peter Nde Fon, Elvis Asangbeng Tanue, Charlotte Wenze Ayima, Odette Dzemo Kibu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnosis, Management, and Future Control of Cholera.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dickson Shey NsaghaDepartment of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 12, Buea, Cameroon. nsaghads@hotmail.com.
Julius AtashiliDepartment of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 12, Buea, Cameroon. atashili@yahoo.ie.
Peter Nde FonDepartment of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 12, Buea, Cameroon. ndepf@yahoo.com.
Elvis Asangbeng TanueDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 12, Buea, Cameroon. asangbengelvis@gmail.com.
Charlotte Wenze AyimaDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 12, Buea, Cameroon. ayimacharlotte@yahoo.com.
Odette Dzemo KibuDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 12, Buea, Cameroon. yayaodette@yahoo.com.
University of Buea · CM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholera is an acute diarrheal disease caused by the bacterium, Vibrio cholerae. A cholera epidemic occurred in Cameroon in 2010. After a cholera-free period at the end of 2010, new cases started appearing in early 2011. The disease affected 23,152 people and killed 843, with the South West Region registering 336 cases and 13 deaths. Hence, we assessed the risk factors of cholera epidemic in the Buea Health District to provide evidence-based cholera guidelines.

methodsWe conducted an unmatched case-control study. Cases were identified from health facility records and controls were neighbours of the cases in the same community. We interviewed 135 participants on socio-economic, household hygiene, food and water exposures practices using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data was analyzed using STATA. Fisher exact test and logistic regression were computed. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

resultsThe 135 participants included 34 (25.2 %) cholera cases and 101 (74.8 %) controls. More females [78 (57.8 %)] participated in the study. Ages ranged from 1 year 3 months to 72 years; with a mean of 29.86 (±14.51) years. The cholera attack rate was 0.03 % with no fatality. Most participants [129 (99.2 %)] had heard of cholera. Poor hygienic practices [77 (59.2 %)] and contaminated water sources [54 (41.5 %)] were the main reported transmission routes of cholera. Good hygienic practices [108 (83.1 %)] were the main preventive methods of cholera in both cases [23 (76.6 %)] and controls [85 (85.0 %)]. Logistic regression analysis showed age below 21 years (OR = 1.72, 95 % CI: 0.73-4.06, p = 0.251), eating outside the home (OR = 1.06, CI: 0.46-2.43, p = 1.00) and poor food preservation method (OR = 9.20, CI: 3.67-23.08, p < 0.0001) were independent risk factors of cholera. Also, irregular water supply (OR = 0.66, 95 % CI: 0.30-1.43, p = 0.320), poor kitchen facility (OR = 0.60, CI: 0.16-2.23, p = 0.560), lack of home toilet (OR = 0.69, CI: 0.25-1.86, p = 0.490), and education below tertiary (OR = 0.87, 95 % CI: 0.36-2.11, p = 0.818) were independent protective factors for the occurrence of cholera.

conclusionThere was a good knowledge of cholera among participants. Poor food preservation method was a significant independent risk factor of cholera. Improvement in hygiene and sanitation conditions and water infrastructural development is crucial to combating the epidemic.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCameroonCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCholeraEpidemicsFemaleFood SupplyHumansHygieneInfantLogistic ModelsMale

Identifiers

PMID26577770
PMCPMC4650512
OpenAlexW2180840556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.