Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26577603›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2016

Automated segmentation of the canine corpus callosum for the measurement of diffusion tensor imaging.

David E Peterson, Steven D Chen, Evan Calabrese, Leonard E White, James M Provenzale

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David E PetersonDuke University School of Medicine, USA.
Steven D ChenDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, USA.
Evan CalabreseDuke University Center for In Vivo Microscopy, USA.
Leonard E WhiteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, USA Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, USA.
James M ProvenzaleDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, USA james.provenzale@dm.duke.edu.
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
Agilent Direct Drive 9.4T MRS/MRI ConsoleS10OD010683 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2012
$597k
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897NIH HHS 1S10OD01068-01NIH HHS S10 OD010683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of this study was to apply image registration-based automated segmentation methods to measure diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics within the canine brain. Specifically, we hypothesized that this method could measure DTI metrics within the canine brain with greater reproducibility than with hand-drawn region of interest (ROI) methods. We performed high-resolution post-mortem DTI imaging on two canine brains on a 7 T MR scanner. We designated the two brains as brain 1 and brain 2. We measured DTI metrics within the corpus callosum of brain 1 using a hand-drawn ROI method and an automated segmentation method in which ROIs from brain 2 were transformed into the space of brain 1. We repeated both methods in order to measure their reliability. Mean differences between the two sets of hand-drawn ROIs ranged from 4% to 10%. Mean differences between the hand-drawn ROIs and the automated ROIs were less than 3%. The mean differences between the first and second automated ROIs were all less than 0.25%. Our findings indicate that the image registration-based automated segmentation method was clearly the more reproducible method. These results provide the groundwork for using image registration-based automated segmentation methods to measure DTI metrics within the canine brain. Such methods will facilitate the study of white matter pathology in canine models of neurologic disease.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSubtraction TechniqueAnimalsCorpus CallosumDiffusion Tensor ImagingDogsImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedIn Vitro TechniquesMachine LearningPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityCanine braincorpus callosumdiffusion tensor imagingimage registrationsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID26577603
PMCPMC4978335
OpenAlexW2338663978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.