ReviewBMC medical ethics2015
The acceptability of conducting data linkage research without obtaining consent: lay people's views and justifications.
Review in BMC medical ethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on privacy, trust, and transparency.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Attitudes of Longitudinal Study Participants and Members of the Public Towards Data Sharing for Secondary Research: A Survey Based Approach.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2026Article
- Article
- Talking Ethics Early in Health Data Public Private Partnerships.Journal of business ethics : JBE · 2024Article
- Review
- Patients' and Members of the Public's Wishes Regarding Transparency in the Context of Secondary Use of Health Data: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Article
- Overcoming ethical and legal obstacles to data linkage in health research: stakeholder perspectives.International journal of population data science · 2023Article
- Improving Cohort-Hospital Matching Accuracy through Standardization and Validation of Participant Identifiable Information.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Comparative sensitivity of social media data and their acceptable use in research.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Feasibility of Monitoring Health and Well-being in Emerging Adults: Pilot Longitudinal Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Jordanian views regarding sharing of medical data for research: A cross-sectional study during COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2022Observational
- Trust and Trade-Offs in Sharing Data for Precision Medicine: A National Survey of Singapore.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Routinely collected data and patient-centred research in anaesthesia and peri-operative care: a narrative review.Anaesthesia · 2021Review
- Chronic pain patients' willingness to share personal identifiers on the web for the linkage of medico-administrative claims and patient-reported data: The chronic pain treatment cohort.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2021Article
- Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent.Systematic reviews · 2021Article
- "Who is watching the watchdog?": ethical perspectives of sharing health-related data for precision medicine in Singapore.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- A qualitative study of big data and the opioid epidemic: recommendations for data governance.BMC medical ethics · 2020Article
- Sources of potential bias when combining routine data linkage and a national survey of secondary school-aged children: a record linkage study.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA key ethical issue arising in data linkage research relates to consent requirements. Patients' consent preferences in the context of health research have been explored but their consent preferences regarding data linkage specifically have been under-explored. In addition, the views on data linkage are often those of patient groups. As a result, little is known about lay people's views and their preferences about consent requirements in the context of data linkage. This study explores lay people's views and justifications regarding the acceptability of conducting data linkage research without obtaining consent.
methodsA qualitative study explored lay people's views regarding consent requirements in data linkage via four hypothetical data linkage scenarios of increasing complexity. Prior to considering the scenarios, participants were provided with information regarding best practice data linkage processes via discussion and a diagrammatic representation of the process.
resultsLay people were able to understand the intricate processes involved in data linkage and the key protections afforded within a short amount of time. They were supportive of data linkage research and, on the whole, believed it should be conducted without consent provided a data linkage organization de-identifies the data used so that researchers do not handle identifiable data. Many thought that de-identified data holds a different status to identifiable data and should be used without specific consent in research that aims to benefit society. In weighing up conflicting values and interests, participants shifted consent preferences before arriving at their final consent preference for each scenario and provided justifications for their choices. They considered the protection of people's information, societal benefits, and the nature and constraints of research and recognized that these need to be balanced.
conclusionsWith some exposure to the features of data linkage, lay people have the capacity to understand the processes sufficiently in order to consider ethical issues associated with consent preferences. Shifts in views reveal the complexity of such decisions. While privacy protection remained an important consideration for most participants, adequate protection measures adopted in best practice data linkage were viewed by most as protection enough for data linkage to proceed without specific individual consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.