Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26577454›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2016

Targeting mTOR and p53 Signaling Inhibits Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer In Vivo.

Venkateshwar Madka, Altaf Mohammed, Qian Li, Yuting Zhang, Laura Biddick, Jagan M R Patlolla, Stan Lightfoot, Rheal A Towner, Xue-Ru Wu, Vernon E Steele and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cancer Chemoprevention: Preclinical In Vivo Alternate Dosing Strategies to Reduce Drug Toxicities.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Review
  7. Identification of Core Genes and Key Pathways via Integrated Analysis of Gene Expression and DNA Methylation Profiles in Bladder Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Venkateshwar MadkaCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Hem-Onc Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Altaf MohammedCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Hem-Onc Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Qian LiCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Hem-Onc Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Yuting ZhangCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Hem-Onc Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Laura BiddickCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Hem-Onc Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Jagan M R PatlollaCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Hem-Onc Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Stan LightfootCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Hem-Onc Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Rheal A TownerAdvanced Magnetic Resonance Center, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Xue-Ru WuDepartment of Urology, NYU Medical Center, New York, New York.
Vernon E SteeleDivision of Cancer Prevention, Chemoprevention Agent Development Research Group, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Levy KopelovichDivision of Cancer Prevention, Chemoprevention Agent Development Research Group, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Chinthalapally V RaoCenter for Cancer Prevention and Drug Development, Hem-Onc Section, Department of Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. cv-rao@ouhsc.edu.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

Reagent/Service CoreP01CA165980 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI WU, XUE-RU · 2013 to 2023
$13.5M
HMG-CoA Reductase and Polyamine Inhibitors for Prevention of Colorectal CancerR01CA094962 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI RAO, CHINTHALAPALLY V. · 2002 to 2014
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS CN53300NCI NIH HHS N01 CN053300NCI NIH HHS P01 CA165980NCI NIH HHS R01 CA094962
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial tumors, accompanied by mutations of the tumor suppressor protein TP53 and dysregulation of mTOR signaling, are frequently associated with aggressive growth and invasiveness. We investigated whether targeting these two pathways would inhibit urothelial tumor growth and progression. Six-week-old transgenic UPII-SV40T male mice (n = 15/group) were fed control diet (AIN-76A) or experimental diets containing mTOR inhibitor (rapamycin, 8 or 16 ppm), p53 stabilizing agent [CP31398 (CP), 150 ppm], or a combination. Mice were euthanized at 40 weeks of age. Urinary bladders were collected and evaluated to determine tumor weight and histopathology. Each agent alone, and in combination, significantly inhibited tumor growth. Treatment with rapamycin alone decreased tumor weight up to 67% (P < 0.0001). Similarly, CP showed approximately 77% (P < 0.0001) suppression of tumor weight. The combination of low-dose rapamycin and CP led to approximately 83% (P < 0.0001) inhibition of tumor weight. There was no significant difference in tumor weights between rapamycin and CP treatments (P > 0.05). However, there was a significant difference between 8 ppm rapamycin and the combination treatment. Tumor invasion was also significantly inhibited in 53% (P < 0.005) and 66% (P < 0.0005) mice after 8 ppm and 16 ppm rapamycin, respectively. However, tumor invasion was suppressed in 73% (P < 0.0001) mice when CP was combined with 8 ppm rapamycin. These results suggest that targeting two or more pathways achieve better treatment efficacy than a single-agent high-dose strategy that could increase the risk of side effects. A combination of CP and rapamycin may be a promising method of inhibiting muscle-invasive urothelial transitional cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell ProliferationInflammationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiceMice, TransgenicMusclesNeoplasm InvasivenessNeovascularization, PathologicPolyaminesSignal TransductionSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesBiomarkers, TumormTOR protein, mousePolyaminesSirolimusTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26577454
PMCPMC4839263
OpenAlexW2173164175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.