Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26577405›Full record

ReviewNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2015

[Biological basis of problematic internet use (PIN) and therapeutic implications].

Kathrin Bauernhofer, Ilona Papousek, Andreas Fink, Human Friedrich Unterrainer, Elisabeth M Weiss

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Problematic internet use (PIN)--a review of assessment questionnaires and risk factors].Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathrin BauernhoferInstitut für Psychologie, Abteilung für Biologische Psychologie, Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 2/DG, 8010, Graz, Österreich.
Ilona PapousekInstitut für Psychologie, Abteilung für Biologische Psychologie, Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 2/DG, 8010, Graz, Österreich.
Andreas FinkInstitut für Psychologie, Abteilung für Biologische Psychologie, Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 2/DG, 8010, Graz, Österreich.
Human Friedrich UnterrainerInstitut für Psychologie, Abteilung für Biologische Psychologie, Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 2/DG, 8010, Graz, Österreich.
Elisabeth M WeissInstitut für Psychologie, Abteilung für Biologische Psychologie, Universität Graz, Universitätsplatz 2/DG, 8010, Graz, Österreich. e.weiss@uni-graz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The repetitive excessive use of internet has led to an increasing number of reports about the negative consequences of overuse and is now viewed as an important public health issue, although the diagnosis of internet addiction remains problematic. Increasing knowledge about the neurobiological mechanism of behavioral addictions will promote future research and is essential for the development of specific and effective treatment. Growing evidence suggests that the neurobiological substrates and pathways of internet addiction resemble those of substance dependency and other forms of behavioral addictions. This paper reviews the current neuroimaging findings and genetic influencing factors for problematic internet use (PIN)/internet addiction. Recent evidence from neuro-scientific studies has pointed out that certain dysfunctions in the prefrontal cortex possibly driven by impaired dopamine neurotransmission are related to symptoms of internet addiction. Finally the literature on psychological and pharmacological interventions for internet addiction will be discussed. However, due to a lack of methodological sound treatment studies in this field it is currently impossible to recommend any evidence-based treatment of internet addiction.

Indexed as

InternetBehavior, AddictiveDopamineEvidence-Based MedicineHumansNeuroimagingPrefrontal CortexProblem BehaviorPublic Health SurveillanceSynaptic TransmissionDopamineBehavioral addictionGeneticInternet addictionNeuroimagingTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.