Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26577345›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2015

Analyzing EEG signals to detect unexpected obstacles during walking.

R Salazar-Varas, Á Costa, E Iáñez, A Úbeda, E Hortal, J M Azorín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R Salazar-VarasCenter for Research and Advanced Studies (Cinvestav), Parque de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica km 9.5 de la Autopista Nueva al Aeropuerto, 201., Monterrey, 66600, NL, Mexico. rsalazar@cinvestav.mx.
Á CostaBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Av. de la Universidad, S/N, Elche, 03202, Spain. acosta@umh.es.
E IáñezBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Av. de la Universidad, S/N, Elche, 03202, Spain. eianez@umh.es.
A ÚbedaBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Av. de la Universidad, S/N, Elche, 03202, Spain. aubeda@umh.es.
E HortalBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Av. de la Universidad, S/N, Elche, 03202, Spain. ehortal@umh.es.
J M AzorínBrain-Machine Interface Systems Lab, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Av. de la Universidad, S/N, Elche, 03202, Spain. jm.azorin@umh.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen an unexpected perturbation in the environment occurs, the subsequent alertness state may cause a brain activation responding to that perturbation which can be detected and employed by a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI). In this work, the possibility of detecting a sudden obstacle appearance analyzing electroencephalographic (EEG) signals is assessed. For this purpose, different features of EEG signals are evaluated during the appearance of sudden obstacles while a subject is walking on a treadmill. The future goal is to use this procedure to detect any obstacle appearance during walking when the user is wearing a lower limb exoskeleton in order to generate an emergency stop command for the exoskeleton. This would enhance the user-exoskeleton interaction, improving the safety mechanisms of current exoskeletons.

methodsIn order to detect the change in the brain activity when an obstacle suddenly appears, different features of EEG signals are evaluated using the recordings of five healthy subjects. Since the change in the brain activity occurs in the time domain, the features evaluated are: common spatial patterns, average power, slope, and the coefficients of a polynomial fit. A Linear Discriminant Analysis-based classifier is used to differentiate between two conditions: the appearance or not of an obstacle. The evaluation of the performance to detect the obstacles is made in terms of accuracy, true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) rates.

resultsFrom the offline analysis, the best performance is achieved when the slope or the polynomial coefficients are used as features, with average detection accuracy rates of 74.0 and 79.5 %, respectively. These results are consistent with the pseudo-online results, where a complete EEG recording is segmented into windows of 500 ms and overlapped 400 ms, and a decision about the obstacle appearance is made for each window. The results of the best subject were 11 out of 14 obstacles detected with a rate of 9.09 FPs/min, and 10 out of 14 obstacles detected with a rate of 6.34 FPs/min using slope and polynomial coefficients features, respectively.

conclusionsAn EEG-based BCI can be developed to detect the appearance of unexpected obstacles. The average accuracy achieved is 79.5 % of success rate with a low number of false detections. Thus, the online performance of the BCI would be suitable for commanding in a safely way a lower limb exoskeleton during walking.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrain-Computer InterfacesSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleWalking

Identifiers

PMID26577345
PMCPMC4650113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.