Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26577203›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2015

Glia in mammalian development and disease.

J Bradley Zuchero, Ben A Barres

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Correlation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Genes in Axonal Regeneration.Molecular neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J Bradley ZucheroDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA brad.zuchero@gmail.com.
Ben A BarresDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glia account for more than half of the cells in the mammalian nervous system, and the past few decades have witnessed a flood of studies that detail novel functions for glia in nervous system development, plasticity and disease. Here, and in the accompanying poster, we review the origins of glia and discuss their diverse roles during development, in the adult nervous system and in the context of disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesMammalsMicrogliaMyelin SheathNerve RegenerationNervous SystemNeurogliaNeuronal PlasticityOligodendrogliaSchwann CellsAstrocyteGliaMicrogliaMyelinationNervous systemOligodendrocyte

Identifiers

PMID26577203
PMCPMC4712885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.