Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26577091›Full record

Trial reportImplementation science : IS2015

Advancing heart health in North Carolina primary care: the Heart Health NOW study protocol.

Bryan J Weiner, Michael P Pignone, C Annette DuBard, Ann Lefebvre, Janet L Suttie, Janet K Freburger, Samuel Cykert

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Implementation science : IS, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02560428 completednot on this map

Evaluating System Change to Advance Learning and Take Evidence to Scale (ESCALATES)

TypeobservationalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2015 to 2022Enrolled7ConditionsProgram EvaluationArmsESCALATES
NCT02585557 nacompletednot on this map

Heart Health NOW (Previously Known as Facilitation, Spread, and Translation of Patient-Centered Evidence in North Carolina Practices)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2015 to 2019Enrolled245ConditionsCardiovascular DiseaseArmsPrimary Care Practice Support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dedicated Workforce Required to Support Large-Scale Practice Improvement.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
  13. Does Ownership Make a Difference in Primary Care Practice?Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
  14. Recruiting Practices for Change Initiatives Is Hard: Findings From EvidenceNOW.American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bryan J WeinerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, CB 7411, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. bryan_weiner@unc.edu.
Michael P PignoneDivision of Internal Medicine, CB 7110, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. Michael_Pignone@med.unc.edu.
C Annette DuBardCommunity Care of North Carolina, 2300 Rexwoods Drive, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. adubard@n3cn.org.
Ann LefebvreNorth Carolina Area Health Education Program, CB 7165, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. ann_lefebvre@med.unc.edu.
Janet L SuttieCommunity Care of North Carolina, 2300 Rexwoods Drive, Suite 100, Raleigh, NC, 27607, USA. jsuttie@n3cn.org.
Janet K FreburgerCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, CB 7590, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. freburger@schsr.unc.edu.
Samuel CykertDivision of Internal Medicine, CB 7110, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. samuel_cykert@med.unc.edu.

Funding

Facilitation, Spread and Translation of Patient-Centered Evidence in NC PracticesR18HS023912 · AHRQ · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CYKERT, SAMUEL NMN · 2015 to 2017
$14.8M
AHRQ HHS 1R18HS023912AHRQ HHS R18 HS023912
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of Heart Health NOW (HHN) is to determine if primary care practice support-a comprehensive evidence-based quality improvement strategy involving practice facilitation, academic detailing, technology support, and regional learning collaboratives-accelerates widespread dissemination and implementation of evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention in small- to medium-sized primary care practices and, additionally, increases practices' capacity to incorporate other evidence-based clinical guidelines in the future. METHODS/

designHHN is a stepped wedge, stratified, cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effect of primary care practice support on evidence-based CVD prevention, organizational change process measures, and patient outcomes. Each practice will start the trial as a control, receive the intervention at a randomized time point, and then enter a maintenance period 12 months after the start of the intervention. The intervention will be randomized to practices in one of four strata defined by region of the state (east or west) and degree of practice readiness for change. Seventy-five practices in each region with a high degree of readiness will be randomized 1:1:1 in blocks of 3 sometime prior to month 8 to receive the intervention at month 9, 11, or 12. An additional 75 practices within each region that have a low degree of readiness or are recruited later will be randomized 1:1 in blocks of 2 prior to month 13 to receive the intervention at month 14 or 16. The sites will be ordered within each strata based on time of enrollment with the blocking based on this ordering. Evaluation will examine the effect of primary care practice support on (1) practice-level delivery of evidence-based CVD prevention, (2) patient-level health outcomes, (3) practice-level implementation of clinical and organizational changes that support delivery of evidence-based CVD prevention, and (4) practice-level capacity to implement future evidence-based clinical guidelines. DISCUSSION: Results will indicate whether primary care practice support is an effective strategy for widespread dissemination and implementation of evidence-based clinical guidelines in primary care practices. Discernible reductions in cardiovascular risk in 300 practices covering over an estimated 900,000 adult patients would likely lead to prevention of thousands of cardiovascular events within 10 years.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02585557.

Indexed as

Research DesignCardiovascular DiseasesCommunity-Institutional RelationsCooperative BehaviorEvidence-Based PracticeFemaleHumansMaleNorth CarolinaPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID26577091
PMCPMC4650518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.