Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26577052›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

DiffLogo: a comparative visualization of sequence motifs.

Martin Nettling, Hendrik Treutler, Jan Grau, Jens Keilwagen, Stefan Posch, Ivo Grosse

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The bladder cancer mEMBO reports · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martin NettlingInstitute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. martin.nettling@informatik.uni-halle.de.
Hendrik TreutlerLeibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle (Saale), Germany. hendrik.treutler@ipb-halle.de.
Jan GrauInstitute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. jan.grau@informatik.uni-halle.de.
Jens KeilwagenInstitute for Biosafety in Plant Biotechnology, Julius Kühn-Institut (JKI), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Quedlinburg, Germany. jens.keilwagen@jki.bund.de.
Stefan PoschInstitute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. stefan.posch@informatik.uni-halle.de.
Ivo GrosseInstitute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany. ivo.grosse@informatik.uni-halle.de.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DEJulius Kühn-Institut · DELeibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor three decades, sequence logos are the de facto standard for the visualization of sequence motifs in biology and bioinformatics. Reasons for this success story are their simplicity and clarity. The number of inferred and published motifs grows with the number of data sets and motif extraction algorithms. Hence, it becomes more and more important to perceive differences between motifs. However, motif differences are hard to detect from individual sequence logos in case of multiple motifs for one transcription factor, highly similar binding motifs of different transcription factors, or multiple motifs for one protein domain.

resultsHere, we present DiffLogo, a freely available, extensible, and user-friendly R package for visualizing motif differences. DiffLogo is capable of showing differences between DNA motifs as well as protein motifs in a pair-wise manner resulting in publication-ready figures. In case of more than two motifs, DiffLogo is capable of visualizing pair-wise differences in a tabular form. Here, the motifs are ordered by similarity, and the difference logos are colored for clarity. We demonstrate the benefit of DiffLogo on CTCF motifs from different human cell lines, on E-box motifs of three basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors as examples for comparison of DNA motifs, and on F-box domains from three different families as example for comparison of protein motifs.

conclusionsDiffLogo provides an intuitive visualization of motif differences. It enables the illustration and investigation of differences between highly similar motifs such as binding patterns of transcription factors for different cell types, treatments, and algorithmic approaches.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer GraphicsSoftwareAmino Acid MotifsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCCCTC-Binding FactorComputational BiologyHumansNucleotide MotifsProtein Structure, TertiaryRepressor ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNATumor Cells, CulturedBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCCCTC-Binding FactorCTCF protein, humanRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26577052
PMCPMC4650857
OpenAlexW2183608621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.