ReviewBlood2016
Eliminating minimal residual disease as a therapeutic end point: working toward cure for patients with CLL.
Review in Blood, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Long term follow-up of a phase II study of cladribine with concurrent rituximab with hairy cell leukemia variant.Blood advances · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Ibrutinib plus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab as initial treatment for younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial.The Lancet. Haematology · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Obinutuzumab plus bendamustine in previously untreated patients with CLL: a subgroup analysis of the GREEN study.Leukemia · 2018Trial
- Prognostic Factors for Complete Response to Ibrutinib in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Clinical Trials.JAMA oncology · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Measurable residual disease after venetoclax treatment for relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Oncogene Mutations: The Shared Antigen Vaccines That Work?Annual review of medicine · 2026Review
- Probing omics data via harmonic persistent homology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: criteria for first-line therapeutic choice-an opinion paper.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Persistence of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Stem-like Populations under Simultaneous In Vitro Treatment with Curcumin, Fludarabine, and Ibrutinib: Implications for Therapy Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Maintenance therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Review
- Measurable Residual Disease Testing in Multiple Myeloma Routine Clinical Practice: A Modified Delphi Study.HemaSphere · 2023Article
- [Chinese consensus on minimal residual disease detection and interpretation of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (2023)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2023Article
- Measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Immunopeptidome Diversity in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Identifies Patients with Favorable Disease Outcome.Cancers · 2022Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep remission and prolonged disease-free survival can be achieved with first-line chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), such as combined fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab, in the majority of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). More modest results are reported with less intense regimens like obinutuzumab plus chlorambucil. Clinical assessment has limited sensitivity in detecting residual disease responsible for subsequent relapse, even including morphologic bone marrow (BM) evaluation. Multicolor flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods can detect minimal residual disease (MRD) to a sensitivity of ≥1:10,000 (10(-4)). Achieving BM MRD-negative complete remission (CR) is associated with superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival; MRD status is the single best posttreatment predictor of long-term outcomes after CIT. Newer oral B-cell receptor signaling pathway inhibitors are highly effective at controlling disease, but best monotherapy responses are typically partial remission, and patients must remain on treatment to maintain disease control. Therapeutic progress is still needed for CLL. We propose that targeting MRD provides opportunity to realize this progress. Achieving BM MRD-negative CR is a prerequisite for long-term unmaintained disease-free survival and potential for cure. We review available methodologies for detecting MRD and correlations with posttreatment outcomes. We discuss the potential utility of MRD to direct individualized therapy. Finally, we discuss the importance of MRD-negative status as a surrogate marker for longer PFS in clinical studies to allow more rapid determination of clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.