Trial reportBMJ open2015
Open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: protocol for a multicentre prospective, open and parallel, randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02355249 (Traditional Three Incisions vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Traditional Three Incisions vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Multi-center, Randomized, and Open-label Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current advances and challenges in minimally invasive esophagectomy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Anti-lymphoma Activity of Acyclic Terpenoids and Its Structure-Activity Relationship: In Vivo, In Vitro, and In Silico Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Piperine attenuates cancer-associated pain induced by microglial activation via increasing miR-150-50p.Aging · 2024Article
- The Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Treatment of Esophageal Cancer: A Step Toward Better Outcomes?Oncology and therapy · 2022Review
- Article
- European consensus on essential steps of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis and McKeown Esophagectomy through Delphi methodology.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Clinical Effect and Postoperative Pain of Laparo-Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Verification of oncological local control for hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal lymph node dissection in esophageal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2021Article
- Mediastinoscopy-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy versus thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a single-center initial experience.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Article
- Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: past, present and future.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- Risk factors for pulmonary morbidities after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: state of the art.Journal of visualized surgery · 2017Review
- The impact of operative approaches on outcomes of middle and lower third esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Assessment of a predictive score for pulmonary complications in cancer patients after esophagectomy.World journal of emergency medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cause of cancer worldwide. In 2009 in China, the incidence and death rate of oesophageal cancer was 22.14 per 100 000 person-years and 16.77 per 100 000 person-years, respectively, the highest in the world. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) was introduced into clinical practice with the aim of reducing the morbidity rate. The mechanisms of MIO may lie in minimising the reaction to surgical injury and inflammation. There are some randomised trials regarding minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy, with 100-850 subjects enrolled. To date, no large randomised controlled trial comparing minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy has been reported in China, where squamous cell carcinoma predominated over adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a 3 year multicentre, prospective, randomised, open and parallel controlled trial, which aims to compare the effectiveness of minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy to open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Group A patients receive MIO which involves thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilisation with cervical anastomosis. Group B patients receive the open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy which involves a right thoracotomy and laparotomy with cervical anastomosis. Primary endpoints include respiratory complications within 30 days after operation. The secondary endpoints include other postoperative complications, influences on pulmonary function, intraoperative data including blood loss, operative time, the number and location of lymph nodes dissected, and mortality in hospital, the length of hospital stay, total expenses in hospital, mortality within 30 days, survival rate after 2 years, postoperative pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Three hundred and twenty-four patients in each group will be needed and a total of 648 patients will finally be enrolled into the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committees of all participating institutions. The findings of this trial will be disseminated to patients and through peer-reviewed publications and international presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02355249.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.