Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26576807›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: protocol for a multicentre prospective, open and parallel, randomised controlled trial.

Juwei Mu, Shugeng Gao, Yousheng Mao, Qi Xue, Zuyang Yuan, Ning Li, Kai Su, Kun Yang, Fang Lv, Bin Qiu and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02355249 (Traditional Three Incisions vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02355249 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Traditional Three Incisions vs Minimally Invasive Thoracol-laparoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Multi-center, Randomized, and Open-label Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorChinese Academy of Medical SciencesRan2014 to 2018Enrolled648ConditionsEsophageal CarcinomaArmsMIE, OE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current advances and challenges in minimally invasive esophagectomy.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Juwei MuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Shugeng GaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Yousheng MaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Qi XueDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Zuyang YuanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Ning LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Kai SuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Kun YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Fang LvDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Bin QiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Deruo LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Keneng ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tiansheng YanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yongtao HanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Sichuan Province Cancer Hospital, Sichuan, China.
Ming DuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Rongyu XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Quanzhou First Hospital, Fujian, China.
Zhaoke WenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The People's Hospital Of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi, China.
Wenxiang WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hunan Province Cancer Hospital, Hunan, China.
Mingxin ShiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Nantong Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu, China.
Quan XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Jiangxi Province People's Hospital, Jiangxi, China.
Shun XuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning, China.
Jie HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking University · CNBeijing Chao-Yang Hospital · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNChongqing Medical University · CNFirst Hospital of China Medical University · CNHangzhou First People's Hospital · CNHunan Cancer Hospital · CNJiangxi Provincial People's Hospital · CNNantong Tumor Hospital · CNSichuan Cancer Hospital · CNThe People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOesophageal cancer is the eighth most common cause of cancer worldwide. In 2009 in China, the incidence and death rate of oesophageal cancer was 22.14 per 100 000 person-years and 16.77 per 100 000 person-years, respectively, the highest in the world. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) was introduced into clinical practice with the aim of reducing the morbidity rate. The mechanisms of MIO may lie in minimising the reaction to surgical injury and inflammation. There are some randomised trials regarding minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy, with 100-850 subjects enrolled. To date, no large randomised controlled trial comparing minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy has been reported in China, where squamous cell carcinoma predominated over adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a 3 year multicentre, prospective, randomised, open and parallel controlled trial, which aims to compare the effectiveness of minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy to open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Group A patients receive MIO which involves thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilisation with cervical anastomosis. Group B patients receive the open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy which involves a right thoracotomy and laparotomy with cervical anastomosis. Primary endpoints include respiratory complications within 30 days after operation. The secondary endpoints include other postoperative complications, influences on pulmonary function, intraoperative data including blood loss, operative time, the number and location of lymph nodes dissected, and mortality in hospital, the length of hospital stay, total expenses in hospital, mortality within 30 days, survival rate after 2 years, postoperative pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Three hundred and twenty-four patients in each group will be needed and a total of 648 patients will finally be enrolled into the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Ethics Committees of all participating institutions. The findings of this trial will be disseminated to patients and through peer-reviewed publications and international presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02355249.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsAdolescentAdultAgedChinaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID26576807
PMCPMC4654388
OpenAlexW2214025029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.