Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26576341›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2015

Effectiveness of the live attenuated rotavirus vaccine produced by a domestic manufacturer in China studied using a population-based case-control design.

Shan-Shan Zhen, Yue Li, Song-Mei Wang, Xin-Jiang Zhang, Zhi-Yong Hao, Ying Chen, Dan Wang, Yan-Hong Zhang, Zhi-Yong Zhang, Jing-Chen Ma and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Health impact of rotavirus vaccination in China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Rotavirus vaccines: progress and new developments.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Global Experience With Rotavirus Vaccines.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shan-Shan ZhenKey Laboratory Medical Molecular Virology, MoE/MoH, and the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032, China.
Yue LiKey Laboratory Medical Molecular Virology, MoE/MoH, and the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032, China.
Song-Mei WangLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Training Center of Medical Experiments, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032, China.
Xin-Jiang ZhangZhengding County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Zhengding 050800, Hebei Province, China.
Zhi-Yong HaoZhengding County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Zhengding 050800, Hebei Province, China.
Ying ChenKey Laboratory Medical Molecular Virology, MoE/MoH, and the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032, China.
Dan WangKey Laboratory Medical Molecular Virology, MoE/MoH, and the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032, China.
Yan-Hong ZhangZhengding County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Zhengding 050800, Hebei Province, China.
Zhi-Yong ZhangZhengding County Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Zhengding 050800, Hebei Province, China.
Jing-Chen MaHebei Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Shijiazhuang 050800, Hebei Province, China.
Peng ZhouKey Laboratory Medical Molecular Virology, MoE/MoH, and the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhen ZhangKey Laboratory Medical Molecular Virology, MoE/MoH, and the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhi-Wei JiangDepartment of Health Statistics, Fourth Military Medical University , Xi'an 710032, Shanxi Province, China.
Yu-Liang ZhaoHebei Province Center for Disease Control and Prevention , Shijiazhuang 050800, Hebei Province, China.
Xuan-Yi WangKey Laboratory Medical Molecular Virology, MoE/MoH, and the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University , Shanghai 200032, China.
Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNAir Force Medical University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A universal rotavirus (RV) immunization program is a potentially cost-effective measure for preventing RV infection in China. However, the efficacy of the only licensed RV vaccine (Lanzhou lamb rotavirus vaccine, LLR), which is made by a domestic manufacturer, has not been proven by a properly designed clinical trial. In October 2011 to March 2012, to measure the potential protection provided by LLR, a case-control study nested in a population-based active diarrhea surveillance study of children <5 years of age was conducted in rural Zhengding county. During the study period, 308 episodes of diarrhea were identified as being caused by RV infection, resulting in an incidence rate of 48.0/1000 people/year. The predominant RV serotype was G3 (61.5%), followed by G1 (15.2%), and G9 (6.5%). Overall, a protection of 35.0% (95% confidence interval (CI), 13.0%-52.0%) was identified, and higher protection was found among moderate RV gastroenteritis cases caused by the serotype G3 (52.0% 95% CI: 2.0%-76.1%). A concurrently conducted case-control study comparing non-RV viral diarrheal cases with non-diarrheal controls in the same population found that the RV vaccine offered no protection against non-RV diarrhea. Even under a less ideal immunization schedule, the oral LLR conferred a certain level of protection against RV gastroenteritis. However, further studies are needed to understand the full characteristics of the LLR, including its efficacy when administered following the optimal regimen, the potential risk of inducing intussusception, and the direct and indirect protective effects of LLR.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolChinaCohort StudiesDiarrheaFecesGastroenteritisGenotyping TechniquesHumansInfantOdds RatioPopulation SurveillanceRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesVaccines, Attenuatedattenuated vaccinecase–control studyChinaeffectivenessrotavirus

Identifiers

PMID26576341
PMCPMC4631931
OpenAlexW2211772157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.