Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26576206›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2015

Recreating blood-brain barrier physiology and structure on chip: A novel neurovascular microfluidic bioreactor.

Jacquelyn A Brown, Virginia Pensabene, Dmitry A Markov, Vanessa Allwardt, M Diana Neely, Mingjian Shi, Clayton M Britt, Orlando S Hoilett, Qing Yang, Bryson M Brewer and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 210 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 403 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Advances in three-dimensional modeling of ischemic injury.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Transport Across the Blood-Brain Barrier.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacquelyn A Brown
Virginia PensabeneDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Dmitry A Markov
Vanessa AllwardtDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
M Diana NeelyDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt Center in Molecular Toxicology, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Mingjian ShiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Clayton M BrittDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Orlando S HoilettDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Qing YangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Bryson M BrewerDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Philip C Samson
Lisa J McCawley
James M MayDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Donna J WebbDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Deyu LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA.
Aaron B BowmanDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt Center in Molecular Toxicology, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA.
Ronald S Reiserer
John P Wikswo
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Manganese NeurotoxicityR01ES010563 · NIEHS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Michael Aschner, Aaron B Bowman · 2001 to 2026
$11.9M
Gene-Neurotoxicant Interactions in Huntington DiseaseR01ES016931 · NIEHS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BOWMAN, AARON B · 2008 to 2018
$4.5M
ASCORBIC ACID FUNCTION AND METABOLISMR01DK050435 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAY, JAMES M. · 1995 to 2015
$4.0M
Neurovascular Unit on a Chip: Regional Chemical Communication, Drug and Toxin ResponsesUH3TR000491 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GHOSH, CHAITALI, JANIGRO, DAMIR · 2014 to 2016
$3.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000491NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK050435NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES016931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a critical structure that serves as the gatekeeper between the central nervous system and the rest of the body. It is the responsibility of the BBB to facilitate the entry of required nutrients into the brain and to exclude potentially harmful compounds; however, this complex structure has remained difficult to model faithfully in vitro. Accurate in vitro models are necessary for understanding how the BBB forms and functions, as well as for evaluating drug and toxin penetration across the barrier. Many previous models have failed to support all the cell types involved in the BBB formation and/or lacked the flow-created shear forces needed for mature tight junction formation. To address these issues and to help establish a more faithful in vitro model of the BBB, we have designed and fabricated a microfluidic device that is comprised of both a vascular chamber and a brain chamber separated by a porous membrane. This design allows for cell-to-cell communication between endothelial cells, astrocytes, and pericytes and independent perfusion of both compartments separated by the membrane. This NeuroVascular Unit (NVU) represents approximately one-millionth of the human brain, and hence, has sufficient cell mass to support a breadth of analytical measurements. The NVU has been validated with both fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran diffusion and transendothelial electrical resistance. The NVU has enabled in vitro modeling of the BBB using all human cell types and sampling effluent from both sides of the barrier.

Identifiers

PMID26576206
PMCPMC4627929
OpenAlexW1847104216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.