Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26576131›Full record

ReviewSarcoma2015

Potential Therapeutic Targets in Uterine Sarcomas.

Tine Cuppens, Sandra Tuyaerts, Frédéric Amant

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sarcoma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Metachronous Sarcomas-a Case Report.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Angiosarcoma: a review of diagnosis and current treatment.American journal of cancer research · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Tine CuppensDepartment of Oncology, Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Sandra TuyaertsDepartment of Oncology, Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Frédéric AmantDepartment of Oncology, Gynaecologic Oncology, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek-Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine sarcomas are rare tumors accounting for 3,4% of all uterine cancers. Even after radical hysterectomy, most patients relapse or present with distant metastases. The very limited clinical benefit of adjuvant cytotoxic treatments is reflected by high mortality rates, emphasizing the need for new treatment strategies. This review summarizes rising potential targets in four distinct subtypes of uterine sarcomas: leiomyosarcoma, low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Based on clinical reports, promising approaches for uterine leiomyosarcoma patients include inhibition of VEGF and mTOR signaling, preferably in combination with other targeted or cytotoxic compounds. Currently, the only targeted therapy approved in leiomyosarcoma patients is pazopanib, a multitargeted inhibitor blocking VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, and c-KIT. Additionally, preclinical evidence suggests effect of the inhibition of histone deacetylases, tyrosine kinase receptors, and the mitotic checkpoint protein aurora kinase A. In low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, antihormonal therapies including aromatase inhibitors and progestins have proven activity. Other potential targets are PDGFR, VEGFR, and histone deacetylases. In high-grade ESS that carry the YWHAE/FAM22A/B fusion gene, the generated 14-3-3 oncoprotein is a putative target, next to c-KIT and the Wnt pathway. The observation of heterogeneity within uterine sarcoma subtypes warrants a personalized treatment approach.

Identifiers

PMID26576131
PMCPMC4632006
OpenAlexW1803625865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.