Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26576110›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of radiology

Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas: Comparison with Conventional Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging.

Hyungjin Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Jeong Hee Yoon, Jin-Young Jang, Sun-Whe Kim, Ji Kon Ryu, Stephan Kannengiesser, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03961646 (Evaluation of the FOCUS Diffusion's Added Clinical Value Compared to Conventional MRI With Wide Field View Diffusion in Focal Pancreatic Lesions Characterization), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03961646 completednot on this map

Evaluation of the FOCUS Diffusion's Added Clinical Value Compared to Conventional MRI With Wide Field View Diffusion in Focal Pancreatic Lesions Characterization

TypeobservationalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2019 to 2020Enrolled74ConditionsCancer of Pancreas
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Synthesizing High-Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hyungjin KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. ; Aerospace Medical Group, Air Force Education and Training Command, Jinju 52634, Korea.
Jeong Min LeeDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. ; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Jeong Hee YoonDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Jin-Young JangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Sun-Whe KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Ji Kon RyuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Stephan KannengiesserSiemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany.
Joon Koo HanDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. ; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
Byung Ihn ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea. ; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.
New Generation University College · ETSeoul National University Hospital · KRKorea Air Force Academy · KRSiemens Healthcare (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the image quality (IQ) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of reduced field-of-view (FOV) di-ffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of pancreas in comparison with full FOV DWI. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, 2 readers independently performed qualitative analysis of full FOV DWI (FOV, 38 × 38 cm; b-value, 0 and 500 s/mm(2)) and reduced FOV DWI (FOV, 28 × 8.5 cm; b-value, 0 and 400 s/mm(2)). Both procedures were conducted with a two-dimensional spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse, in 102 patients with benign or malignant pancreatic diseases (mean size, 27.5 ± 14.4 mm). The study parameters included 1) anatomic structure visualization, 2) lesion conspicuity, 3) artifacts, 4) IQ score, and 5) subjective clinical utility for confirming or excluding initially considered differential diagnosis on conventional imaging. Another reader performed quantitative ADC measurements of focal pancreatic lesions and parenchyma. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare qualitative scores and ADCs between DWI sequences. Mann Whitney U-test was used to compare ADCs between the lesions and parenchyma.

resultsOn qualitative analysis, reduced FOV DWI showed better anatomic structure visualization (2.76 ± 0.79 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 2.81 ± 0.64 at b = 400 s/mm(2)), lesion conspicuity (3.11 ± 0.99 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 3.15 ± 0.79 at b = 400 s/mm(2)), IQ score (8.51 ± 2.05 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 8.79 ± 1.60 at b = 400 s/mm(2)), and higher clinical utility (3.41 ± 0.64), as compared to full FOV DWI (anatomic structure, 2.18 ± 0.59 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 2.56 ± 0.47 at b = 500 s/mm(2); lesion conspicuity, 2.55 ± 1.07 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 2.89 ± 0.86 at b = 500 s/mm(2); IQ score, 7.13 ± 1.83 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 8.17 ± 1.31 at b = 500 s/mm(2); clinical utility, 3.14 ± 0.70) (p < 0.05). Artifacts were significantly improved on reduced FOV DWI (2.65 ± 0.68) at b = 0 s/mm(2) (full FOV DWI, 2.41 ± 0.63) (p < 0.001). On quantitative analysis, there were no significant differences between the 2 DWI sequences in ADCs of various pancreatic lesions and parenchyma (p > 0.05). ADCs of adenocarcinomas (1.061 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.133 at reduced FOV and 1.079 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.135 at full FOV) and neuroendocrine tumors (0.983 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.152 at reduced FOV and 1.004 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.153 at full FOV) were significantly lower than those of parenchyma (1.191 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.125 at reduced FOV and 1.218 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.103 at full FOV) (p < 0.05).

conclusionReduced FOV DWI of the pancreas provides better overall IQ including better anatomic detail, lesion conspicuity and subjective clinical utility.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingAdultAgedArtifactsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic DiseasesPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiographyRetrospective StudiesApparent diffusion coefficientDiffusion-weighted imagingImage qualityMagnetic resonance imagingPancreasReduced field-of-view

Identifiers

PMID26576110
PMCPMC4644742
OpenAlexW1434464482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.