ArticleKorean journal of radiology
Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas: Comparison with Conventional Single-Shot Echo-Planar Imaging.
Article in Korean journal of radiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03961646 (Evaluation of the FOCUS Diffusion's Added Clinical Value Compared to Conventional MRI With Wide Field View Diffusion in Focal Pancreatic Lesions Characterization), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the FOCUS Diffusion's Added Clinical Value Compared to Conventional MRI With Wide Field View Diffusion in Focal Pancreatic Lesions Characterization
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidental findings during pancreatic cyst surveillance: clinical relevance and implications for MRI protocol design.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Improved image quality and T-staging accuracy using FOCUS-MUSE DWI in gastric cancer: a prospective comparison with SS-EPI.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Prospective comparison of synthetic high b-value field of view optimized and constrained undistorted multiplexed sensitivity encoding (FOCUS-MUSE) and FOCUS diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating cervical cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction for improving the image quality of reduced-field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas.World journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Evaluations of the diagnostic performance of ZOOMit diffusion-weighted imaging and conventional diffusion-weighted imaging for breast lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- MRI-based automatic identification and segmentation of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using deep learning network.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Higher field reduced FOV diffusion-weighted imaging for abdominal imaging at 5.0 Tesla: image quality evaluation compared with 3.0 Tesla.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Computed high-b-value high-resolution DWI improves solid lesion detection in IPMN of the pancreas.European radiology · 2023Article
- Added value of zoomed-echo-planar imaging diffusion-weighted imaging for evaluation of periampullary carcinomas.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023Article
- Stability and repeatability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of normal pancreas on 5.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- T2*-corrected Q-Dixon and reduced-FOV diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) parameters: correlation with QCT-derived bone mineral density (BMD) and ability to identify abnormal BMD and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for evaluating myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: a comparison of MUSE-DWI, rFOV-DWI, and DCE-MRI.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- High-resolution reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Comparing the clinical utility of single-shot, readout-segmented and zoomit echo-planar imaging in diffusion-weighted imaging of the kidney at 3 T.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.Medical physics · 2022Article
- The Evaluation of Zoomed Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Two-dimensional Spatial-Selective Radiofrequency Excitation Pulses in Patients With Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Characterization and correction of cardiovascular motion artifacts in diffusion-weighted imaging of the pancreas.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Synthesizing High-Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2021Article
- Single shot zonal oblique multislice SE-EPI diffusion-weighted imaging with low to ultra-high b-values for the differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral spinal fractures.European journal of radiology open · 2021Article
- Clinical Feasibility of Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Technique in Breast Cancer Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the image quality (IQ) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of reduced field-of-view (FOV) di-ffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of pancreas in comparison with full FOV DWI. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, 2 readers independently performed qualitative analysis of full FOV DWI (FOV, 38 × 38 cm; b-value, 0 and 500 s/mm(2)) and reduced FOV DWI (FOV, 28 × 8.5 cm; b-value, 0 and 400 s/mm(2)). Both procedures were conducted with a two-dimensional spatially selective radiofrequency excitation pulse, in 102 patients with benign or malignant pancreatic diseases (mean size, 27.5 ± 14.4 mm). The study parameters included 1) anatomic structure visualization, 2) lesion conspicuity, 3) artifacts, 4) IQ score, and 5) subjective clinical utility for confirming or excluding initially considered differential diagnosis on conventional imaging. Another reader performed quantitative ADC measurements of focal pancreatic lesions and parenchyma. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare qualitative scores and ADCs between DWI sequences. Mann Whitney U-test was used to compare ADCs between the lesions and parenchyma.
resultsOn qualitative analysis, reduced FOV DWI showed better anatomic structure visualization (2.76 ± 0.79 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 2.81 ± 0.64 at b = 400 s/mm(2)), lesion conspicuity (3.11 ± 0.99 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 3.15 ± 0.79 at b = 400 s/mm(2)), IQ score (8.51 ± 2.05 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 8.79 ± 1.60 at b = 400 s/mm(2)), and higher clinical utility (3.41 ± 0.64), as compared to full FOV DWI (anatomic structure, 2.18 ± 0.59 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 2.56 ± 0.47 at b = 500 s/mm(2); lesion conspicuity, 2.55 ± 1.07 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 2.89 ± 0.86 at b = 500 s/mm(2); IQ score, 7.13 ± 1.83 at b = 0 s/mm(2) and 8.17 ± 1.31 at b = 500 s/mm(2); clinical utility, 3.14 ± 0.70) (p < 0.05). Artifacts were significantly improved on reduced FOV DWI (2.65 ± 0.68) at b = 0 s/mm(2) (full FOV DWI, 2.41 ± 0.63) (p < 0.001). On quantitative analysis, there were no significant differences between the 2 DWI sequences in ADCs of various pancreatic lesions and parenchyma (p > 0.05). ADCs of adenocarcinomas (1.061 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.133 at reduced FOV and 1.079 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.135 at full FOV) and neuroendocrine tumors (0.983 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.152 at reduced FOV and 1.004 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.153 at full FOV) were significantly lower than those of parenchyma (1.191 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.125 at reduced FOV and 1.218 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s ± 0.103 at full FOV) (p < 0.05).
conclusionReduced FOV DWI of the pancreas provides better overall IQ including better anatomic detail, lesion conspicuity and subjective clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.