Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26576015›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2016

Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding colorectal cancer screening among ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands - a qualitative study.

Anke J Woudstra, Evelien Dekker, Marie-Louise Essink-Bot, Jeanine Suurmond

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Language as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in flanders: an ecological study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019
    Review
  15. The Role of the Social Network in Access to Psychosocial Services for Migrant Elderly-A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anke J WoudstraDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Evelien DekkerDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marie-Louise Essink-BotDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeanine SuurmondDepartment of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch has shown that ethnic minority groups are less likely to participate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening than the majority population and hence less likely to be diagnosed at an early stage when treatment is potentially more successful.

objectiveTo explore knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding CRC and CRC screening among ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands.

designWe conducted qualitative interviews with 30 first-generation immigrants born in Turkey, Morocco and Surinam. We based the topic guide on the health belief model. Framework analysis was used to analyse our data.

resultsAlthough knowledge of CRC and CRC screening was limited, all respondents felt susceptible to CRC. CRC screening was perceived to mainly benefit those individuals with poor health and symptoms. Although most respondents had a positive attitude towards CRC screening, knowledge about its potential harms was limited and self-efficacy to participate was low. Adult children acted as important mediators in providing access to information. The language barrier and low literacy formed serious barriers to informed participation in CRC screening.

conclusionTo ensure that all eligible individuals, including ethnic minority groups, have equal opportunities to informed participation in screening, targeted communication strategies should be developed, such as oral and visual channels, and face-to-face communication in the mother tongue. This will help ethnic minority groups to make an informed decision about participation in CRC screening.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMass ScreeningAgedColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedMoroccoNetherlandsQualitative ResearchSurinameTurkeyattitudesbeliefscolorectal cancercolorectal cancer screeningethnic minoritieshealth belief modelknowledgepreventionqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID26576015
PMCPMC5139054
OpenAlexW2176186931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.