ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2016
Therapies on the horizon for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential Expression of LLT1, SLAM Receptors CS1 and 2B4 and NCR Receptors NKp46 and NKp30 in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL).International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in Mexico: mortality trend analysis, 1998-2018.Salud publica de Mexico · 2022Article
- A Bayesian multivariate latent t-regression model for assessing the association between corticosteroid and cranial radiation exposures and cardiometabolic complications in survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a PETALE study.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Late Effects of Therapy in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia SurvivorsTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2019Review
- Physical training interventions for children and teenagers affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia and related treatment impairments.Oncotarget · 2018Review
- Therapeutic targeting of CK2 in acute and chronic leukemias.Leukemia · 2018Review
- Article
- The promise of Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies.Cytokine · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe prognosis for children with the most common childhood malignancy, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), has improved dramatically. However, the burden of therapy can be substantial, with long-term side-effects, and certain subgroups continue to have a poor outcome. RECENT
findingsThe recent discovery of new genetic alterations in high-risk subsets provides targets for precision medicine-based interventions using existing Food and Drug Administration approved agents. Novel immunotherapeutic approaches are being deployed in relapsed ALL, one of the leading causes of cancer cell death in children. Moreover, genomic analysis has charted the evolution of tumor subclones, and relapse-specific alterations now provide a mechanistic explanation for drug resistance, setting the stage for targeted therapy. There is greater recognition that host factors - genetic polymorphisms - influence cancer risk, response to therapy, and toxicity. In the future, it is anticipated that they will be integrated into clinical decision making to maximize cure and minimize side-effects. Recent efforts to limit prophylactic central nervous system irradiation have been successful, thereby sparing many children late neurocognitive impairments. SUMMARY: Integration of advances in precision medicine approaches and novel agents will continue to increase the cure rate and decrease the burden of therapy for childhood ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.