ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2015
DFTB3 Parametrization for Copper: The Importance of Orbital Angular Momentum Dependence of Hubbard Parameters.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiscale Investigation of Triboelectric Nanogenerator: An Expanded DFT Calculation Based on Machine Learning.ACS omega · 2026Article
- DFTB Parametrization at the Example of Platinum-Implementation, Validation and Practical Considerations.Journal of computational chemistry · 2026Article
- Parametrization of Zirconium for DFTB3/3OB: A Pathway to Study Complex Zr-Compounds for Biomedical and Material Science Applications.Journal of computational chemistry · 2025Article
- CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Collision-Induced Dissociation of Fucose and Identification of Anomericity.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2024Article
- Improvement of d-d interactions in density functional tight binding for transition metal ions with a ligand field model: assessment of a DFTB3+Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020Article
- Differences in the Nature of the Phosphoryl Transfer Transition State in Protein Phosphatase 1 and Alkaline Phosphatase: Insights from QM Cluster Models.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- Cu(I) Controls Conformational States in Human Atox1 Metallochaperone: An EPR and Multiscale Simulation Study.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2020Article
- Density-functional tight-binding: basic concepts and applications to molecules and clusters.Advances in physics: X · 2020Article
- Analysis of Density Functional Tight Binding with Natural Bonding Orbitals.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2019Article
- Exploring the applicability of density functional tight binding to transition metal ions. Parameterization for nickel with the spin-polarized DFTB3 model.Journal of computational chemistry · 2019Article
- Analysis of Phosphoryl-Transfer Enzymes with QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.Methods in enzymology · 2018Article
- Metal Ion Modeling Using Classical Mechanics.Chemical reviews · 2017Review
- Perspective: Quantum mechanical methods in biochemistry and biophysics.The Journal of chemical physics · 2016Article
- Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications.Chemical reviews · 2016Review
- Molecular Basis for Differential Anion Binding and Proton Coupling in the Cl(-)/H(+) Exchanger ClC-ec1.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2016Article
- Copper Oxidation/Reduction in Water and Protein: Studies with DFTB3/MM and VALBOND Molecular Dynamics Simulations.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2016Article
- QM/MM free energy simulations: recent progress and challenges.Molecular simulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We report the parametrization of a density functional tight binding method (DFTB3) for copper in a spin-polarized formulation. The parametrization is consistent with the framework of 3OB for main group elements (ONCHPS) and can be readily used for biological applications that involve copper proteins/peptides. The key to our parametrization is to introduce orbital angular momentum dependence of the Hubbard parameter and its charge derivative, thus allowing the 3d and 4s orbitals to adopt different sizes and responses to the change of charge state. The parametrization has been tested by applying to a fairly broad set of molecules of biological relevance, and the properties of interest include optimized geometries, ligand binding energies, and ligand proton affinities. Compared to the reference QM level (B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ, which is shown here to be similar to the B97-1 and CCSD(T) results, in terms of many properties of interest for a set of small copper containing molecules), our parametrization generally gives reliable structural properties for both Cu(I) and Cu(II) compounds, although several exceptions are also noted. For energetics, the results are more accurate for neutral ligands than for charged ligands, likely reflecting the minimal basis limitation of DFTB3; the results generally outperform NDDO based methods such as PM6 and even PBE with the 6-31+G(d,p) basis. For all ligand types, single-point B3LYP calculations at DFTB3 geometries give results very close (∼1-2 kcal/mol) to the reference B3LYP values, highlighting the consistency between DFTB3 and B3LYP structures. Possible further developments of the DFTB3 model for a better treatment of transition-metal ions are also discussed. In the current form, our first generation of DFTB3 copper model is expected to be particularly valuable as a method that drives sampling in systems that feature a dynamical copper binding site.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.