Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26575171›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2016

Bevacizumab and radiotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma: brothers in arms or unholy alliance?

Maximilian Niyazi, Patrick N Harter, Elke Hattingen, Maya Rottler, Louisa von Baumgarten, Martin Proescholdt, Claus Belka, Kirsten Lauber, Michel Mittelbronn

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The use of radiosensitizing agents in the therapy of glioblastoma multiforme-a comprehensive review.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Endothelial-Tumor Cell Interaction in Brain and CNS Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Glioblastoma: Overview of Disease and Treatment.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2016
    Review
  16. Recent advances and future of immunotherapy for glioblastoma.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Germany.
Patrick N HarterGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Elke HattingenDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Maya RottlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Germany.
Louisa von BaumgartenDepartment of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Martin ProescholdtDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Germany.
Kirsten LauberDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Munich, Germany.
Michel MittelbronnGerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) represents the most frequent primary brain tumor in adults and carries a dismal prognosis despite aggressive, multimodal treatment regimens involving maximal resection, radiochemotherapy, and maintenance chemotherapy. Histologically, GBMs are characterized by a high degree of VEGF-mediated vascular proliferation. In consequence, new targeted anti-angiogenic therapies, such as the monoclonal anti-VEGF-A antibody bevacizumab, have proven effective in attenuating tumor (neo)angiogenesis and were shown to possess therapeutic activity in several phase II trials. However, the role of bevacizumab in the context of multimodal therapy approaches appears to be rather complex. This review will give insights into current concepts, limitations, and controversies regarding the molecular mechanisms and the clinical benefits of bevacizumab treatment in combination with radio(chemo)therapy--particularly in face of the results of recent phase III trials, which failed to demonstrate convincing improvements in overall survival (OS).

Indexed as

AdultAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyGlioblastomaHumansNeovascularization, PathologicVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanangiogenesisbevacizumabgliomaradiotherapyVEGF

Identifiers

PMID26575171
PMCPMC4823037
OpenAlexW2181158647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.