ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2016
The preexposure prophylaxis revolution; from clinical trials to programmatic implementation.
Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- Costs of HIV testing services in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Pooled it
- HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake, retention and adherence among female sex workers in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Infectious Disease Modelling of HIV Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Compartmental Models.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Pooled it
- Awareness and willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of enhanced peer PrEP referral with HIV self-testing delivery among young Kenyan women: A randomized controlled trial of peer networks.PLoS medicine · 2026Trial
- Acceptability of six-monthly PrEP dispensing supported with interim HIV self-testing to simplify PrEP delivery in Kenya: findings from qualitative research.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies VRC07-523LS and PGT121 Administered Subcutaneously for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Trial
- Integration of pre-exposure prophylaxis services into public HIV care clinics in Kenya: a pragmatic stepped-wedge randomised trial.The Lancet. Global health · 2021Trial
- Acceptability of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir (CAB LA) in HIV-Uninfected Individuals: HPTN 077.AIDS and behavior · 2020Trial
- "You talk about problems until you feel free": South African adolescent girls' and young women's narratives on the value of HIV prevention peer support clubs.BMC public health · 2020Trial
- Distance to clinic is a barrier to PrEP uptake and visit attendance in a community in rural Uganda.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2019Trial
- Expanding PrEP Access Through Decentralized Delivery Models.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2026Review
- PrEP Use Willingness and Perceptions Among Young Female Sex Workers in Kisumu, Kenya: Implications for HIV Prevention.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Article
- Opportunity for cost savings with a novel differentiated model of PrEP delivery: a comparative costing analysis of six-month PrEP supported by interim HIV self-testing and standard of care PrEP dispensing in Kenya.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Awareness, willingness, and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men in Ghana.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Low HIV-risk aligned discontinuation among HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis users within public HIV clinics in Kenya: A mixed method study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Female sex worker preferences for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery in Uganda: A discrete choice experiment.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Contraception and PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and practices among adolescent girls and young women in Nampula, Mozambique.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Facilitators and barriers of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among four key populations in Iran.BMC health services research · 2024Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAn investment in preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery must have public health impact in reducing HIV infections. Sustainable delivery of PrEP requires policy, integration of services, and synergy with other existing HIV prevention programs. This review discusses key policy and programmatic considerations for implementation and scale up of PrEP in Africa. RECENT
findingsPrEP delivery has been delayed by concerns about adherence and delivery in 'real world' settings. Demonstration projects and clinical service delivery models are providing evidence of PrEP effectiveness with an impact much higher than that found in randomized clinical trials. Data confirm that PrEP uptake, adherence, and retention has been high, more so by persons who perceive themselves at high risk for HIV infection, and PrEP is well tolerated. PrEP delivery is more than dispensation of a pill and programs should address other risk drivers, which differ by population. In Africa, barriers to PrEP uptake and adherence include stigma among MSM and low HIV risk perception among young women. Additional data have provided insight into optimal points of service delivery, provider training requirements and quality assurance needs. Of the 2 million new HIV infections in 2014, 70% were in Africa. PrEP use is not lifelong, and use limited to periods of risk may be both effective and cost-effective for the continent. SUMMARY: HIV prevention programs should determine strategies to identify those at substantial risk for HIV infection, formulate and deliver PrEP in combination with interventions that target social drivers of HIV vulnerability specific to each population. Policy guidance for optimal combination of interventions and service delivery avenues, clinical protocols, health infrastructure requirements are required. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency data are essential for policy guidance to navigate ethical questions over use of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-negative individuals when treatment coverage has not been attained in many parts of Africa. Countries need to invest in purposeful advocacy at both local and global forums. Failure to implement PrEP will be a failure to protect future generations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.