Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26574910›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2016

Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiviral treatment in the management of seasonal influenza A: point-of-care rapid test versus clinical judgment.

Léon Nshimyumukiza, Xavier Douville, Diane Fournier, Julie Duplantie, Rana K Daher, Isabelle Charlebois, Jean Longtin, Jesse Papenburg, Maryse Guay, Maurice Boissinot and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Léon NshimyumukizaFaculté de Médecine, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Xavier DouvilleFaculté des sciences et génie, Département de génie électrique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Diane FournierFaculté des sciences et génie, Département de génie électrique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Julie DuplantieFaculté de Médecine, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Rana K DaherCentre de recherche en infectiologie (CRI), CHU de Québec (CHUQ), Québec, QC, Canada.
Isabelle CharleboisCentre de recherche en infectiologie (CRI), CHU de Québec (CHUQ), Québec, QC, Canada.
Jean LongtinCentre de recherche en infectiologie (CRI), CHU de Québec (CHUQ), Québec, QC, Canada.
Jesse PapenburgFaculté de Médecine, Département de pédiatrie, Université McGill, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Maryse GuayFaculté de médecine, Département des sciences de la santé communautaire, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.
Maurice BoissinotFaculté de sciences et de génie, Département de physique, génie physique et d'optique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Michel G BergeronCentre de recherche en infectiologie (CRI), CHU de Québec (CHUQ), Québec, QC, Canada.
Denis BoudreauFaculté de sciences et de génie, Département de chimie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Christian GagnéFaculté des sciences et génie, Département de génie électrique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
François RousseauFaculté de médecine, Département de biologie moléculaire, biochimie médicale et pathologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Daniel ReinharzFaculté de Médecine, Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA point-of-care rapid test (POCRT) may help early and targeted use of antiviral drugs for the management of influenza A infection.

objective(i) To determine whether antiviral treatment based on a POCRT for influenza A is cost-effective and, (ii) to determine the thresholds of key test parameters (sensitivity, specificity and cost) at which a POCRT based-strategy appears to be cost effective.

methodsAn hybrid « susceptible, infected, recovered (SIR) » compartmental transmission and Markov decision analytic model was used to simulate the cost-effectiveness of antiviral treatment based on a POCRT for influenza A in the social perspective. Data input parameters used were retrieved from peer-review published studies and government databases. The outcome considered was the incremental cost per life-year saved for one seasonal influenza season.

resultsIn the base-case analysis, the antiviral treatment based on POCRT saves 2 lives/100,000 person-years and costs $7600 less than the empirical antiviral treatment based on clinical judgment alone, which demonstrates that the POCRT-based strategy is dominant. In one and two way-sensitivity analyses, results were sensitive to the POCRT accuracy and cost, to the vaccination coverage as well as to the prevalence of influenza A. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the POCRT strategy is cost-effective in 66% of cases, for a commonly accepted threshold of $50,000 per life-year saved.

conclusionThe influenza antiviral treatment based on POCRT could be cost-effective in specific conditions of performance, price and disease prevalence.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care SystemsAdolescentAdultAgedAntiviral AgentsCanadaChildCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ManagementHumansInfluenza, HumanJudgmentMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalSeasonsSensitivity and SpecificityAntiviral AgentsAntiviral treatmentcost effectivenesspoint-of-care rapid testseasonal influenzasimulation

Identifiers

PMID26574910
PMCPMC4746566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.