Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26574709›Full record

ReviewMuscle & nerve2016

ALS biomarkers for therapy development: State of the field and future directions.

Michael Benatar, Kevin Boylan, Andreas Jeromin, Seward B Rutkove, James Berry, Nazem Atassi, Lucie Bruijn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Muscle & nerve, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. IsomiR Utility in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Prognostication.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael BenatarDepartment of Neurology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA, 33136.
Kevin BoylanDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Andreas JerominIron Horse Diagnostics, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Seward B RutkoveDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
James BerryDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Nazem AtassiDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lucie BruijnALS Association, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

Uncovering new genes and disease modifiers for ALS and related disordersU54NS092091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MICHAEL E. SHY · 2014 to 2026
$19.8M
Molecular Imaging of Inflammation in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)K23NS083715 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ATASSI, NAZEM · 2014 to 2018
$927k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS083715NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS092091NINDS NIH HHS U54-NS-092091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers have become the focus of intense research in the field of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), with the hope that they might aid therapy development efforts. Notwithstanding the discovery of many candidate biomarkers, none have yet emerged as validated tools for drug development. In this review we present a nuanced view of biomarkers based on the perspective of the Food and Drug Administration; highlight the distinction between discovery and validation; describe existing and emerging resources; review leading biological fluid-based, electrophysiological, and neuroimaging candidates relevant to therapy development efforts; discuss lessons learned from biomarker initiatives in related neurodegenerative diseases; and outline specific steps that we, as a field, might take to hasten the development and validation of biomarkers that will prove useful in enhancing efforts to develop effective treatments for ALS patients. Most important among these is the proposal to establish a federated ALS Biomarker Consortium in which all interested and willing stakeholders may participate with equal opportunity to contribute to the broader mission of biomarker development and validation.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisBiomarkersDrug DiscoveryHumansUnited StatesBiomarkersALSbiomarkersdisease progressionpharmacodynamicpredictiveprognostic

Identifiers

PMID26574709
PMCPMC4718795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.