Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26574427›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2015

Stacking Free Energies of All DNA and RNA Nucleoside Pairs and Dinucleoside-Monophosphates Computed Using Recently Revised AMBER Parameters and Compared with Experiment.

Reid F Brown, Casey T Andrews, Adrian H Elcock

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Reversible Redox-Responsive Peptide Condensates With RNA.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SurFlex microscopy: Measuring flexibility of surface-tethered biomolecules.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stereoselectivity of Aminoacyl-RNA Loop-Closing Ligation.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dissecting the energetic architecture within an RNA tertiary structural motif via high-throughput thermodynamic measurements.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reid F BrownDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Casey T AndrewsDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Adrian H ElcockDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Iowa , Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Molecular Simulations of Folding & Association in Physiological EnvironmentsR01GM087290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ELCOCK, ADRIAN HAMILTON · 2009 to 2017
$1.6M
Molecular Simulations of Cotranslational FoldingR01GM099865 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ELCOCK, ADRIAN HAMILTON · 2012 to 2015
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087290NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM087290NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099865NIGMS NIH HHS R01- GM099865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the results of a series of 1-μs-long explicit-solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations performed to compare the free energies of stacking (ΔGstack) of all possible combinations of DNA and RNA nucleoside (NS) pairs and dinucleoside-monophosphates (DNMPs). For both NS pairs and DNMPs, we show that the computed stacking free energies are in reasonable qualitative agreement with experimental measurements and appear to provide the closest correspondence with experimental data yet found among computational studies; in all cases, however, the computed stacking free energies are too favorable relative to experimental data. Comparisons of NS-pair systems indicate that stacking interactions are very similar in RNA and DNA systems except when a thymine or uracil base is involved: the presence of a thymine base favors stacking by ∼0.3 kcal/mol relative to a uracil base. One exception is found in the self-stacking of cytidines, which are found to be significantly more favorable for the DNA form; an analysis of the rotational orientations sampled during stacking events suggests that this is likely to be due to more favorable sugar-sugar interactions in stacked complexes of deoxycytidines. Comparisons of the DNMP systems indicate that stacking interactions are more favorable in RNA than in DNA except, again, when thymine or uracil bases are involved. Finally, additional simulations performed using a previous generation of the AMBER force field-in which the description of glycosidic bond rotations was less than optimal-produce computed stacking free energies that are in poorer agreement with experimental data. Overall, the simulations provide a comprehensive view of stacking thermodynamics in NS pairs and in DNMPs as predicted by a state-of-the-art MD force field.

Indexed as

Base PairingDinucleoside PhosphatesDNAMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationRNAThermodynamicsDinucleoside PhosphatesDNARNA

Identifiers

PMID26574427
PMCPMC4651843
OpenAlexW2060555689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.