ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2015
Quantum effects in cation interactions with first and second coordination shell ligands in metalloproteins.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Insight into molecular basis and dynamics of full-length CRaf kinase in cellular signaling mechanisms.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- Flexibility of Binding Site is Essential to the CaJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- System-Specific Parameter Optimization for Nonpolarizable and Polarizable Force Fields.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Theoretical and Data-Driven Approaches for Biomolecular Condensates.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Millisecond molecular dynamics simulations of KRas-dimer formation and interfaces.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Better force fields start with better data: A data set of cation dipeptide interactions.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Polarization Effects in Water-Mediated Selective Cation Transport across a Narrow Transmembrane Channel.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021Article
- Improving Tabletability of Excipients by Metal-Organic Framework-Based Cocrystallization: a Study of Mannitol and CaClPharmaceutical research · 2020Article
- Impact of electronic polarizability on protein-functional group interactions.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020Article
- Zinc binding proteome of a phytopathogenRoyal Society open science · 2019Article
- Polarizable Force Fields for Biomolecular Simulations: Recent Advances and Applications.Annual review of biophysics · 2019Review
- Molecular mechanism of substrate selectivity of the arginine-agmatine Antiporter AdiC.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Many-body effect determines the selectivity for CaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Identification of a unique CaNature communications · 2018Article
- Ion Permeation Mechanism in Epithelial Calcium Channel TRVP6.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Permeating disciplines: Overcoming barriers between molecular simulations and classical structure-function approaches in biological ion transport.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes · 2018Review
- Mapping Ryanodine Binding Sites in the Pore Cavity of Ryanodine Receptors.Biophysical journal · 2017Article
- Glutamate Water Gates in the Ion Binding Pocket of NaScientific reports · 2017Article
- Molecular mechanism of Zn2+ inhibition of a voltage-gated proton channel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Despite decades of investigations, the principal mechanisms responsible for the high affinity and specificity of proteins for key physiological cations K(+), Na(+), and Ca(2+) remain a hotly debated topic. At the core of the debate is an apparent need (or lack thereof) for an accurate description of the electrostatic response of the charge distribution in a protein to the binding of an ion. These effects range from partial electronic polarization of the directly ligating atoms to long-range effects related to partial charge transfer and electronic delocalization effects. While accurate modeling of cation recognition by metalloproteins warrants the use of quantum-mechanics (QM) calculations, the most popular approximations used in major biomolecular simulation packages rely on the implicit modeling of electronic polarization effects. That is, high-level QM computations for ion binding to proteins are desirable, but they are often unfeasible, because of the large size of the reactive-site models and the need to sample conformational space exhaustively at finite temperature. Several solutions to this challenge have been proposed in the field, ranging from the recently developed Drude polarizable force-field for simulations of metalloproteins to approximate tight-binding density functional theory (DFTB). To delineate the usefulness of different approximations, we examined the accuracy of three recent and commonly used theoretical models and numerical algorithms, namely, CHARMM C36, the latest developed Drude polarizable force fields, and DFTB3 with the latest 3OB parameters. We performed MD simulations for 30 cation-selective proteins with high-resolution X-ray structures to create ensembles of structures for analysis with different levels of theory, e.g., additive and polarizable force fields, DFTB3, and DFT. The results from DFT computations were used to benchmark CHARMM C36, Drude, and DFTB3 performance. The explicit modeling of quantum effects unveils the key electrostatic properties of the protein sites and the importance of specific ion-protein interactions. One of the most interesting findings is that secondary coordination shells of proteins are noticeably perturbed in a cation-dependent manner, showing significant delocalization and long-range effects of charge transfer and polarization upon binding Ca(2+).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.