Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26574188›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

External evaluation of published population pharmacokinetic models of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients.

Chen-Yan Zhao, Zheng Jiao, Jun-Jun Mao, Xiao-Yan Qiu

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chen-Yan ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, 200040.
Zheng JiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, 200040.
Jun-Jun MaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, 200040.
Xiao-Yan QiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Middle Urumqi Road, Shanghai, 200040.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimSeveral tacrolimus population pharmacokinetic models in adult renal transplant recipients have been established to facilitate dose individualization. However, their applicability when extrapolated to other clinical centres is not clear. This study aimed to (1) evaluate model external predictability and (2) analyze potential influencing factors.

methodsPublished models were screened from the literature and were evaluated using an external dataset with 52 patients (609 trough samples) collected by postoperative day 90 via methods that included (1) prediction-based prediction error (PE%), (2) simulation-based prediction- and variability-corrected visual predictive check (pvcVPC) and normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) tests and (3) Bayesian forecasting to assess the influence of prior observations on model predictability. The factors influencing model predictability, particularly the impact of structural models, were evaluated.

resultsSixteen published models were evaluated. In prediction-based diagnostics, the PE% within ±30% was less than 50% in all models, indicating unsatisfactory predictability. In simulation-based diagnostics, both the pvcVPC and the NPDE indicated model misspecification. Bayesian forecasting improved model predictability significantly with prior 2-3 observations. The various factors influencing model extrapolation included bioassays, the covariates involved (CYP3A5*3 polymorphism, postoperative time and haematocrit) and whether non-linear kinetics were used.

conclusionsThe published models were unsatisfactory in prediction- and simulation-based diagnostics, thus inappropriate for direct extrapolation correspondingly. However Bayesian forecasting could improve the predictability considerably with priors. The incorporation of non-linear pharmacokinetics in modelling might be a promising approach to improving model predictability.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationModels, BiologicalArea Under CurveBayes TheoremCohort StudiesCytochrome P-450 CYP3AHematocritHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsPolymorphism, GeneticPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesTacrolimusTransplant RecipientsCytochrome P-450 CYP3AImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimusadult renal transplant recipientsexternal evaluationnon-linear kineticspopulation pharmacokineticstacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID26574188
PMCPMC4834594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.