Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26573726›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2015

An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used in the East Sepik province of Papua New Guinea.

Michael Koch, Dickson Andrew Kehop, Boniface Kinminja, Malcolm Sabak, Graham Wavimbukie, Katherine M Barrows, Teatulohi K Matainaho, Louis R Barrows, Prem P Rai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michael KochCenter for Biopharmaceutical Research, De La Salle Health Sciences Institute, Dasmarinas, Cavite, Philippines. mkochdlshsi@gmail.com.
Dickson Andrew KehopSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, PO Box 5623, Boroko, NCD, Papua New Guinea.
Boniface KinminjaSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, PO Box 5623, Boroko, NCD, Papua New Guinea. batzibonz@gmail.com.
Malcolm SabakSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, PO Box 5623, Boroko, NCD, Papua New Guinea. malcolmsabak@gmail.com.
Graham WavimbukieSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, PO Box 5623, Boroko, NCD, Papua New Guinea. wavimbukieg@gmail.com.
Katherine M BarrowsDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, 30 S. 2000 E., Salt Lake City, 84112, UT, USA. k.barrows@utah.edu.
Teatulohi K MatainahoSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, PO Box 5623, Boroko, NCD, Papua New Guinea. lmatainaho@yahoo.com.
Louis R BarrowsDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Utah, 30 S. 2000 E., Salt Lake City, 84112, UT, USA. lbarrows@pharm.utah.edu.
Prem P RaiSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, PO Box 5623, Boroko, NCD, Papua New Guinea. pprai.prem@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid modernization in the East Sepik (ES) Province of Papua New Guinea (PNG) is resulting in a decrease in individuals knowledgeable in medicinal plant use. Here we report a synthesis and comparison of traditional medicinal plant use from four ethnically distinct locations in the ES Province and furthermore compare them to two other previous reports of traditional plant use from different provinces of PNG.

methodsThis manuscript is based on an annotated combination of four Traditional Medicines (TM) survey reports generated by University of Papua New Guinea (UPNG) trainees. The surveys utilized a questionnaire titled "Information sheet on traditional herbal preparations and medicinal plants of PNG", administered in the context of the TM survey project which is supported by WHO, US NIH and PNG governmental health care initiatives and funding. Regional and transregional comparison of medicinal plant utilization was facilitated by using existing plant databases: the UPNG TM Database and the PNG Plant Database (PNG Plants) using Bayesian statistical analysis.

resultsMedicinal plant use between four distinct dialect study areas in the ES Province of PNG showed that only a small fraction of plants had shared use in each area, however usually utilizing different plant parts, being prepared differently and to treat different medical conditions. Several instances of previously unreported medicinal plants could be located. Medicinally under- and over-utilized plants were found both in the regional reports and in a transregional analysis, thus showing that these medicinal utilization frequencies differ between provinces.

conclusionsDocumentation of consistent plant use argues for efficacy and is particularly important since established and effective herbal medicinal interventions are sorely needed in the rural areas of PNG, and unfortunately clinical validation for the same is often lacking. Despite the existence of a large corpus of medical annotation of plants for PNG, previously unknown medical uses of plants can be uncovered. Furthermore, comparisons of medicinal plant utilization is possible if databases are reformatted for consistencies that allow comparisons. A concerted effort in building easily comparable databases could dramatically facilitate ethnopharmacological analysis of the existing plant diversity.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyEthnopharmacologyPapua New GuineaPhytotherapyPlants, MedicinalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26573726
PMCPMC4647451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.