Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26573665›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

A fast method for calculating reliable event supports in tree reconciliations via Pareto optimality.

Thu-Hien To, Edwin Jacox, Vincent Ranwez, Celine Scornavacca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thu-Hien ToISEM - Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Place Eugène Bataillon, Montpellier, 34392, France. thu-hien.to@univ-montp2.fr.
Edwin JacoxISEM - Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Place Eugène Bataillon, Montpellier, 34392, France. edwin.jacox@unvi-montp2.fr.
Vincent RanwezMontpellier SupAgro, UMR AGAP, 2 Place P. Viala, Montpellier, 34060, France. vincent.ranwez@supagro.inra.fr.
Celine ScornavaccaISEM - Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, EPHE, Place Eugène Bataillon, Montpellier, 34392, France. celine.scornavacca@unvi-montp2.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven a gene and a species tree, reconciliation methods attempt to retrieve the macro-evolutionary events that best explain the discrepancies between the two tree topologies. The DTL parsimonious approach searches for a most parsimonious reconciliation between a gene tree and a (dated) species tree, considering four possible macro-evolutionary events (speciation, duplication, transfer, and loss) with specific costs. Unfortunately, many events are erroneously predicted due to errors in the input trees, inappropriate input cost values or because of the existence of several equally parsimonious scenarios. It is thus crucial to provide a measure of the reliability for predicted events. It has been recently proposed that the reliability of an event can be estimated via its frequency in the set of most parsimonious reconciliations obtained using a variety of reasonable input cost vectors. To compute such a support, a straightforward but time-consuming approach is to generate the costs slightly departing from the original ones, independently compute the set of all most parsimonious reconciliations for each vector, and combine these sets a posteriori. Another proposed approach uses Pareto-optimality to partition cost values into regions which induce reconciliations with the same number of DTL events. The support of an event is then defined as its frequency in the set of regions. However, often, the number of regions is not large enough to provide reliable supports.

resultsWe present here a method to compute efficiently event supports via a polynomial-sized graph, which can represent all reconciliations for several different costs. Moreover, two methods are proposed to take into account alternative input costs: either explicitly providing an input cost range or allowing a tolerance for the over cost of a reconciliation. Our methods are faster than the region based method, substantially faster than the sampling-costs approach, and have a higher event-prediction accuracy on simulated data.

conclusionsWe propose a new approach to improve the accuracy of event supports for parsimonious reconciliation methods to account for uncertainty in the input costs. Furthermore, because of their speed, our methods can be used on large gene families. Our algorithms are implemented in the ecceTERA program, freely available from http://mbb.univ-montp2.fr/MBB/.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyAlgorithmsComputer SimulationGenes, BacterialProteobacteriaReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID26573665
PMCPMC4647304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.