ReviewJournal of medical systems2016
A Review of Automatic Methods Based on Image Processing Techniques for Tuberculosis Detection from Microscopic Sputum Smear Images.
Review in Journal of medical systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel TB smear microscopy automation system in detecting acid-fast bacilli for tuberculosis - A multi-center double blind study.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2022Trial
- A smear test aiding with an automated slide reader acquires equivalent sensitivity to MGIT960 culture in pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Validation of Digital Slide Scanning and a Convolutional Neural Network for the Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Focus Measures for Hyperspectral Imaging Microscopy Using Principal Component Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis Using an Intelligent Microscopy Scanner and Image Recognition Model for Improved Acid-Fast Bacilli Detection in Smears.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Retrospective validation of MetaSystems' deep-learning-based digital microscopy platform with assistance compared to manual fluorescence microscopy for detection of mycobacteria.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Deep-Learning-Based Screening and Ancillary Testing for Thyroid Cytopathology.The American journal of pathology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of an AI-Based TB AFB Smear Screening System for Laboratory Diagnosis on Routine Practice.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tuberculosis Disease Diagnosis Based on an Optimized Machine Learning Model.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligence Are Emerging Diagnostic Tools for the Clinical Microbiologist.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Developing and verifying automatic detection of active pulmonary tuberculosis from multi-slice spiral CT images based on deep learning.Journal of X-ray science and technology · 2020Article
- Parallel implementations to accelerate the autofocus process in microscopy applications.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2020Article
- Quantifying Microorganisms at Low Concentrations Using Digital Holographic Microscopy (DHM).Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It primarily affects the lungs, but it can also affect other parts of the body. TB remains one of the leading causes of death in developing countries, and its recent resurgences in both developed and developing countries warrant global attention. The number of deaths due to TB is very high (as per the WHO report, 1.5 million died in 2013), although most are preventable if diagnosed early and treated. There are many tools for TB detection, but the most widely used one is sputum smear microscopy. It is done manually and is often time consuming; a laboratory technician is expected to spend at least 15 min per slide, limiting the number of slides that can be screened. Many countries, including India, have a dearth of properly trained technicians, and they often fail to detect TB cases due to the stress of a heavy workload. Automatic methods are generally considered as a solution to this problem. Attempts have been made to develop automatic approaches to identify TB bacteria from microscopic sputum smear images. In this paper, we provide a review of automatic methods based on image processing techniques published between 1998 and 2014. The review shows that the accuracy of algorithms for the automatic detection of TB increased significantly over the years and gladly acknowledges that commercial products based on published works also started appearing in the market. This review could be useful to researchers and practitioners working in the field of TB automation, providing a comprehensive and accessible overview of methods of this field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26573654What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.