ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2016
Laboratory assessments in the course of Parkinson's disease: a clinician's perspective.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revolutionizing our understanding of Parkinson's disease: Dr. Heinz Reichmann's pioneering research and future research direction.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024Review
- Article
- Management of Psychosis in Parkinson's Disease: Emphasizing Clinical Subtypes and Pathophysiological Mechanisms of the Condition.Parkinson's disease · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physicians, caregivers and patients themselves must be alert to the onset of and changes in motor and non-motor features during the course of Parkinson's disease (PD). Parallel laboratory routine assessments are necessary because of the evolving impairment of the general health status of the individual. A number of potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of PD are currently under investigation, with diagnosis early in the disease course a particular goal, even before the onset of motor symptoms. The aim of this guideline article is to provide user-friendly, clinical evidence-based recommendations for using laboratory pathological testing for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of PD, for assessing its time course, and managing complications of long-term dopaminergic therapy and the disabling motor features that develop in the later stages of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.