Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26573389›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2016

Quality of life in the follow-up of uveal melanoma patients after enucleation in comparison to CyberKnife treatment.

A Klingenstein, C Fürweger, A K Mühlhofer, S F Leicht, U C Schaller, A Muacevic, B Wowra, C Hintschich, K H Eibl

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Liquid Biomarker in Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [CyberKnife®: new treatment option for uveal melanoma].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A KlingensteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany. Annemarie.Klingenstein@med.uni-muenchen.de.
C FürwegerEuropean CyberKnife® Center, Munich, Germany.
A K MühlhoferDepartment of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany.
S F LeichtDepartment of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany.
U C SchallerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany.
A MuacevicEuropean CyberKnife® Center, Munich, Germany.
B WowraEuropean CyberKnife® Center, Munich, Germany.
C HintschichDepartment of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany.
K H EiblDepartment of Ophthalmology, Klinikum der Universität München Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Mathildenstraße 8, D-80336, Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare quality of life (QoL) in patients with uveal melanoma after enucleation and stereotactic radiosurgery to that in an age-matched patient collective.

methodsQoL was assessed in a cross-sectional survey and compared among 32 uveal melanoma patients after enucleation, 48 patients after stereotactic radiosurgery (CyberKnife(®); Accuray(®) Incorporated, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), and an age-matched control group of 35 patients, using the SF-12 Health Survey. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test, Student's t test, one-way ANOVA analysis, Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney test), and ordered logistic regression for multivariate analysis.

resultsThere was no significant difference in QoL between patients treated by stereotactic radiosurgery and the age-matched control group. After enucleation, patients presented significantly lower values in Physical Functioning (PF), Role Physical (RP), and Role Emotional (RE) compared to the radiosurgery and control group. To control for the overall QoL lowering effect of visual loss, the QoL of the patients who underwent enucleation was compared with the QoL of patients suffering severe functional loss after CyberKnife radiosurgery in a subgroup analysis, which showed no statistically significant difference. The number of comorbidities had a significant impact on QoL in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsSuperior performance in PF, RP, and RE suggests that CyberKnife represents a suitable first-line therapy for uveal melanoma. In cases with painful amaurosis or vast tumor recurrence, enucleation can be performed with an acceptable QoL outcome.

Indexed as

Eye EnucleationRadiosurgeryAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSickness Impact ProfileSurveys and QuestionnairesUveal MelanomaCyberKnifeEnucleationQuality of lifeSF-12 Health SurveyStereotactic radiosurgeryUveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID26573389
OpenAlexW2240589441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.