Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26573281›Full record

ArticleDrug metabolism letters2016

Impact of Cytochrome P450 2C19*2 and *3 on Clopidogrel Loading Dose in Saudi Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Hassan Khalaf, Ahmad AbdulRahman Al Meman, Seemab Rasool

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug metabolism letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Effect of CYP2C19 and Nongenetic Factors on Clopidogrel Responsiveness in the MENA Region: A Systematic Review.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  3. Recent research progress on the mechanisms of clopidogrel resistance.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hassan Khalaf
Ahmad AbdulRahman Al MemanCollege of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, P.O. Box 6655 , Almulaida 51452. meman@qu.edu.sa.
Seemab Rasool
Saud Al-babtain Cardiac Centre · SAQassim University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging evidence shows that clopidogrel is greatly affected by nonfunctioning alleles measured by P2Y12 or platelet reactivity units (PRU). Cardiac events during short in-hospital stays have been inconclusively suggested as the main causes of discrepancies.

objectivesEvaluate the impact of CYP2C19 allele *2 and allele *3 on PRU and the potential clinical consequences of such interaction. To establish a rough estimation for the safe PRU limits for short inhospital stay following PCI.

methodA short-term experimental study was conducted with 90 patients who underwent coronary angioplasty with drug eluting stents at the Prince Sultan Cardiac Center, Buraidah. All the patients received an initial loading dose of 300 mg clopidogrel, followed by 75 mg daily. Blood samples were used for DNA extraction for cytochrome P450 (CYP) and realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for genotyping. PRU and inhibition rate were tested by Verifynow®. All in-hospital cardiac events were recorded until patients were discharged.

resultsGenotypes 1/1, 2/2, and 1/2 were expressed by 60, 28, and two patients (67, 32, and 3%), respectively. The PRU of the female patients was significantly higher than that of the male patients was (255.6 ± 68.8 and 177.7 ± 66.6, p = 0.000, respectively). There was no significant difference in PRUs (193 ± 79 and 212 ±55.4, respectively, p = 0.349), nor inhibition (17.9 ± 18.80 and 13.88 ± 11.5, p = 0.135) in wild and resistant variants, respectively. We only reported one cardiac in-thrombosis events.

conclusionGenotype differences may not explain variations in the PRU of patients during short-term in-hospital stays. Although it is difficult to confirm, 117-267 units may be a safe PRU range for such patients, with emphasis on attaining higher PRU values in females.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionPolymorphism, GeneticAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedClopidogrelCoronary ThrombosisCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Drug Dosage CalculationsFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmacogeneticsPhenotypePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsClopidogrelCYP2C19 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2C19Platelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID26573281
PMCPMC4997918
OpenAlexW2287799393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.